| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
| :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
| :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date | |
| :message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ZG2/tL8 | |
| vTuwlzJULFgIDc1CG7Gvl+J3XJUDqehOmFaq37sjSnHUJBRpULLFgIQx81Oc0rJ2 | |
| ye6SmIjfJArMMIr+geq3j3s2fpfYkXcdXYKg49NX4lK/AiVY9FW4kwyAMVP/3R/J | |
| bV77A9lL81lQDrf78ccGGLjDpbYjiiU5vJRE= | |
| DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
| :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
| :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date | |
| :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=URgjciSkbDSTg | |
| B4RTduzxJJ+DTY=; b=N865Avg8t1b4+xxBmh/pKjkZITR6y26gZ+C9SLkpwxoY5 | |
| 49YpboTpaz8QO5eOnx7YYst6JIklUR6AwiyAkr59WbZsTDaknRRebiSuXtfpYKyO | |
| yQEuc37hh5IGZtmnpMXjDqW57p71FjzaLbezaoixcrpIK4yqCJq0AlfWVefPj8= | |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
| X-Virus-Found: | No |
| X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 |
| X-HELO: | mail-wi0-f180.google.com |
| X-Received: | by 10.194.71.84 with SMTP id s20mr25570671wju.89.1445931269861; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:34:29 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <190443388.20151026144831@yandex.ru> |
| References: | <CAF8BazAy7x2Nxeb6P=ns7=Dy5ENzd=Cg0oKxJjDtBg0JzGjM-g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <133366775 DOT 20151025170018 AT yandex DOT ru> <CAF8BazBBFrCdPLJMw2ZiuSx_syLLqq7MMwWrsCM+CqE8Y9e4Tw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <190443388 DOT 20151026144831 AT yandex DOT ru> |
| From: | Aleksey Midenkov <midenok AT gmail DOT com> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:34:10 +0300 |
| Message-ID: | <CAF8BazDLiRjrshKN4PxK6PcAz+3Z_i-wNxAgDra=CDdrABunbw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Subject: | Re: Why package cache is not used during setup download? |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru> wrote: > Greetings, Aleksey Midenkov! > >>>> Cygwin setup process my turn to endless retry-error on bad internet >>>> channels, because: >>> >>>> 1. setup doesn't know how to retry download (why it fails to download anyway?); >>> >>> Because your internet is bad? > >> On the second thought I believe that the problem is with setup.exe >> itself. Because: > >> a) I tried different mirrors. It always fails in somewhere between >> 80-90% (of total progress). >> b) I never noticed any problems with downloading files except with >> Cygwin. Gigabyte-sized files via http are downloading without fail. > > If you get consistent results from different mirrors (and since you're the > only person reporting it), my second thought is that it is a local issue. > Overly zealous antivirus/firewall coming to mind. I remember this was also happening long time ago (about 10 years or more) in completely different environment of course. Anyway, local problem with *Cygwin-only* means problem with Cygwin. I rarely use Cygwin and when I use it, I always stumble upon this. Maybe there is another reason of why you don't know of other complaints. > >>>> 2. setup doesn't use cache of previously downloaded files and always >>>> redownload all packages from the beginning. >>> >>> It do use cache, if checksum is correct. > >> Hmmm, on setup.ini doc says: > >> install: filename size-in-bytes MD5 sum > > As David pointed out already, MD5 hash proven weak and is no longer used in > sensitive environments. I don't need to know who the David is and what he pointed out. But what does this mean in core, the documentation is wrong and checksum is done with different algorithm? > > > -- > With best regards, > Andrey Repin > Monday, October 26, 2015 14:45:39 > > Sorry for my terrible english... > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |