X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=lcOYDs1dZqSYW6ec
	M7NaWeElTj4IQizlEZ2bqL5F5EMcFzjIvctRW1yUbc4HK1qYzWuwUiofF42GJ3cj
	VBAFh/WxxbTJeMKKYxBmgoSWoOT9bqCEa/gwGHMxc4ioKyV94mpTjpRSjtG1uD1O
	tmxueIlWGcl3Z4Mb2+OizarKt9k=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=L+RqJ9jPfnhGYPuTQkA2Eb
	hb+78=; b=uamAQELMpFsECYIfsU1dNjTsfbgd/mfjJqROpB34WM8S0ly/wqQqGS
	2wROwGAjsz+uuhMoCvAWdUjkucWfBgae4OHSiD2WCJKeHoP3x0OTL45GqeQ3g5Dt
	BE65/Q6pG4WABAaucNQk/CCqRhclwxRFETeJcPYFPJ8+jYrerkhh4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,BAYES_999,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtp.ht-systems.ru
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:33:56 +0300
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<1598393077.20151021153356@yandex.ru>
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Error accessing mapped drive >2TB?
In-Reply-To:	<20151021100328.GL5319@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<CA+2x6-L_pqdN6PHE0c15hcmrmB66Z75Hz95cH+dbcn4yXuVZNg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <712A87EA-64C7-4033-BE7F-39C8C8D527EB AT etr-usa DOT com> <20151021100328 DOT GL5319 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t9LCZRR3022749

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!

>> > The only thing I can think of is that the 2nd drive is >2TB.
>> 
>> The same thing happens here with a 3.1 TB Fusion drive and a 500 GB external drive, so no, I don’t think the volume size is the real issue.
>> 
>> I assume you are seeing the same thing that I am, that Explorer shows the root contents of both drives just fine?
>> 
>> When I strace’d an ls of one of these root shares here, I got 764 lines of…emissions, of which this section seems the most interesting to me:
>> 
>> 1051  263166 [main] ls 4720 stat64: entering
>>   625  263791 [main] ls 4720 normalize_posix_path: src /p
>>   609  264400 [main] ls 4720 normalize_posix_path: /p = normalize_posix_path (/p)
>>   630  265030 [main] ls 4720 mount_info::conv_to_win32_path: conv_to_win32_path (/p)
>>   653  265683 [main] ls 4720 mount_info::cygdrive_win32_path: src '/p', dst 'P:\'
>>   668  266351 [main] ls 4720 set_flags: flags: binary (0x2)
>>   674  267025 [main] ls 4720 mount_info::conv_to_win32_path: src_path /p, dst P:\, flags 0x4022, rc 0
>>  1168  268193 [main] ls 4720 symlink_info::check: 0x0 = NtCreateFile (\??\P:\)
>> 10641  278834 [main] ls 4720 symlink_info::check_reparse_point: NtFsControlFile(FSCTL_GET_REPARSE_POINT) failed, 0xC0000275
>>   839  279673 [main] ls 4720 symlink_info::check: not a symlink
>>  1049  280722 [main] ls 4720 symlink_info::check: 0 = symlink.check(P:\, 0x24B620) (0x4022)
>>   655  281377 [main] ls 4720 path_conv::check: this->path(P:\), has_acls(0)
>>   640  282017 [main] ls 4720 stat_worker: got 5 error from path_conv
>>   757  282774 [main] ls 4720 __set_errno: int stat_worker(path_conv&, stat*):1933 setting errno 5
>>   714  283488 [main] ls 4720 stat_worker: -1 = (\??\P:\,0x600042080)
>> 
>> Why errno 5 from path_conv?

> Probably because of the above

>   symlink_info::check_reparse_point: NtFsControlFile(FSCTL_GET_REPARSE_POINT)
>   failed, 0xC0000275

> This is in fact a weird error code in this scenario.

> Consider that symlink_info::check_reparse_point is *only* called, if the
> file to check (here "P:\") has the FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT flag
> set.  So from the Windows perspective it is certainly a reparse point.

> Cygwin checks the flag to allow evaluating of reparse points as symlinks.
> If the flag is set, it calls symlink_info::check_reparse_point which in
> turn calls

>   status = NtFsControlFile (..., FSCTL_GET_REPARSE_POINT, ...);

> to fetch the target information the reparse point points to, in POSIX
> terms the symlink target.  But *this* call returns a status of 0xC0000275,
> which means STATUS_NOT_A_REPARSE_POINT.  And since it's totally unexpected
> that NtFsControlFile fails on a reparse point, the code sets errno to EIO.

> Hang on.

> The FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT flag is set but when calling a function
> to fetch the reparse data it's no reparse point anymore?  How dumb is
> that?

That's… interesting.
Windows does not allow for reparse points to networked locations.
Symlinks all right, directory junctions no.

> I can't reproduce this bug with my Samba drives, but it's not actually a
> bug in Cygwin from my perspective.

> Yeah, that observation doesn't really help, so I applied a potential
> workaround to Cygwin.  If you're set up to build your own Cygwin, please
> give it a try.  Otherwise I'll upload a new snapshot in the next couple of
> days.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Wednesday, October 21, 2015 15:32:13

Sorry for my terrible english...

- Raw text -