X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=uY6J2o3628mfIqZA
	rDDYkPNsVbFgUKbCD2IM4UB8mEBu3joRr6pIRW000lis/HRqn4k/LqkMTUvtd0MO
	QFnZsjbTDxYUk4Ij4Vza9queWlQSKyUb5p93J18NX8a2hn2PxmiaHFJFKVm6d9Nv
	73Rf5aGLNN3ZvcP2smnLRj6KrnY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=UuxrE/MbYa0oAqXrzwL58Z
	AZ8Pk=; b=X/IZ2fuD2qS8bOBbPEU1qnkaSrTwg0s6Ez9n0YGvFABa2Hn7ijGNoD
	IyRNm0VyyQbavZhLloiuHEecTmOAM5yi2Zx4kWK17hRJXkv+ZIgyWN4Lk2I5QdvA
	xunQZAuTbCwcJDYGDSuwWEgCPNx10oy1CLn5BKRi5v2P1G7yK1TQs=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	limerock02.mail.cornell.edu
X-CornellRouted:	This message has been Routed already.
Subject:	Re: How to correctly rebase?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Rainer DOT Woitok AT gmail DOT com
References:	<22046 DOT 25592 DOT 311399 DOT 765933 AT woitok DOT gmail DOT com> <8925F252-F479-4990-B568-1EC612DF39A5 AT etr-usa DOT com> <22047 DOT 42793 DOT 36600 DOT 773496 AT woitok DOT gmail DOT com> <41C9E795-AEEC-4378-8548-44DAF7DB98E7 AT etr-usa DOT com> <5620164E DOT 1010508 AT cornell DOT edu> <22048 DOT 47638 DOT 206600 DOT 117271 AT woitok DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
Message-ID:	<5620F460.7020605@cornell.edu>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:58:08 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<22048.47638.206600.117271@woitok.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 10/16/2015 4:49 AM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Ken,
>
> On Thursday, 2015-10-15 17:10:38 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Another possibility is that those DLLs were in use.  Rainer, did you make sure
>> that no Cygwin processes were running other than dash?
>
> Well, at least  I tried to.   I ran "/bin/ps -ef"  and only saw one "ps"
> and one "ash" process.
>
>> ...
>> No, it's because rebase is called with the -s option, which implies the -d
>> option, which means that it starts at 0x70000000 and works down.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.  This had escaped me.
>
>>                                                                    Rainer, you
>> can run 'rebase -is' to see the full list of base addresses.
>
> I did, and I think this list os more or less the same as the output from
> "rebaslst".  But I'll compare more thoroughly later.  What caught my eye
> though is that both lists seemed sorted more or less with respect to de-
> scending file names, except for
>
> /usr/bin/cygLLVM-3.1.dll                     base 0x5ca90000 size 0x0128a000
> /home/Rainer/repo/netcdf/bin/cygnetcdf-7.dll base 0x5dd20000 size 0x032a0000
> /usr/bin/cygORBitCosNaming-2-0.dll           base 0x61580000 size 0x0000c000
>
> All my other local DLLs appear at the very end  of these lists.  Is this
> just the way "rebase" works internally or does this indicate a problem?

I don't know off the top of my head, but I wouldn't worry about this.
>
> Talking about problems:  Python still  does not work  (and perhaps other
> stuff I just haven't yet tried).  Should I try re-installing Python?
>
> But I would be more at rest if this all would be sort of explainable.

As Warren and Achim have both suggested, you may just have too many DLLs for 
32-bit Cygwin.  Can you uninstall some unneeded packages?  Or switch to 64-bit 
Cygwin?

By the way, I don't think you have yet attached cygcheck output as requested in 
http://cygwin.com/problems.html:  "Run cygcheck -s -v -r > cygcheck.out and 
include that file as an attachment in your report.  Please do not compress or 
otherwise encode the output.  Just attach it as a straight text file so that it 
can be easily viewed."  Maybe someone will spot something.

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -