X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=yf
	rzzNEJTmpIk6kikJFuabCz4Yap/Q2zqntLitk8fT70lD/vovmEfjOBzpjQtVN+Ht
	U1IcRa5PZH7iD1qys0K27cRFEqavvry/3zbuGqCtRo37xf+V8i8m0liogSKiSZmM
	YxpIU+SouXRT841SmTOqZUXmbAgFY8B7a/m68ASlo=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=Q6iN1Da8
	fGfuRyIXqZUlRsdRIWU=; b=jLG8ZBxYpecq7Q/tqoGnv2F7zAhmehP3kLWSgftX
	AX0e4nZkoifCPID7XLKU9PiaOzrTZsSYI4xHziAavCE6UYsNgTJ5HXjj1mWQifp6
	2iJh3WCYvAguO6foMHeLXTG5+ppDnUerzbgF3sA2xZgX3/NGlx6KBkYmkubTviQp
	1Zc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-yk0-f171.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XePFf3xpIwstumkmuBccCTwGVLqP+3PVgfQBCBNj9W4=; b=RaZiT7tNdRqfN2yLj2k4eFBs0F7fRxro0AnQnJlI7IiPGJirPNkRxjAW0dHh7B9B+n Eb8LQMcTWMpAKklUendRKw1tJeedIhU7ABdWB1NdDjq20BuTe5zaDP+DeP6/ZmnLv/gt ZUN2SnekOOvzbcNpxDXQx/NN+d4ZjHphMx0p56IZAvVzeFIm3jWQWJNOgdCm3JGI/5iF G+MjjcdYf1KRUHbVLK/uHE2Zoz8ORv/e94hN8LTw12eIM4xoM6SLzDNNV2E85SpbGNOu JTJrrsDPhOd1V+SCgZjcu1OXF7lmmxTSlyLsW4pxnRs07+SgAddaR5PdV+TzTfcNQMxq zEAg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQnBX9xocDliBLaXoz3OTEp1uO0cuGMVraLS5pAJQC3BWH4BJqp9+xF2/BG3rsokwR//wC/l
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.129.83.87 with SMTP id h84mr10736846ywb.156.1443737470897; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<1443720905.8588.17.camel@cygwin.com>
References:	<CAKmU=T_XtcOf1MOa_31oTfNYzUZ6QZD1xU9eTG-ERkvsua+gZQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <56095DBC DOT 6090308 AT gmail DOT com> <1443720905 DOT 8588 DOT 17 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:11:10 -0700
Message-ID:	<CAOC2fq_vWAMCYjmaW1VH5bkAhrUB810X3Dqnjf9nX0Y5_vwoew@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [Cygwin-ports-general] Ncview
From:	Michael Enright <mike AT kmcardiff DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
> Confirmed.  Often 64-bit-only issues come down to one or more of the
> following:
>
> * implicit function declarations.  Per the C standard, argument types
> are assumed to match whatever is given (which may be wrong if e.g. 0 is
> used instead of 0L or (PointerType)0 or NULL etc.) and the return type
> is assumed to be int (which will truncate the actual return value when
> it is actually a long/pointer).
>
> * vararg types.  Because these types aren't declared, the compiler can't
> automatically cast values to the correct type, so literal values and
> symbolic constants must be explicitly cast if they are not meant to be
> an int and are not obviously a long/pointer.
>

Good list. I would also add attempting to store pointer differences in
an "int" instead of ptrdiff_t and the issue you can see from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit_computing#64-bit_data_models,
which is that the integer types other than long long on 64-bit Windows
are 32-bits while on 64-bit Linux 'long' and 'long long' are both
64-bit. This issue means that 'long' is a good-enough hack for
ptrdiff_t on 64-bit Linux but not 64-bit Windows. Does Cygwin differ
from Windows itself on this issue? Most 32-bit-designed code is
probably more sensitive to the pointer-difference aspect of this.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -