X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=tTOuAWWovkMnvZjXbOc1Wx1nA+VwI5KSmG+wAuWbMU5
	n+6xpHG/3B9AWHXxj/+ALk0xNr5MEi7gz6+hH4iK8fMTPIQZZPhGpKrbWXkGYDmd
	P7FTjJAEOKMSYFTaiNkfO7SMJqavyxNSYFPTurE5s19e6/mdjKJ4gYI3wfQrHpvw
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=MhjFtiWUntb5hqapZg5l9e9HoQY=; b=mkJ07koJRbKFX7mkD
	OpWfT3vKUpmd0t6eg+IoR/g7YIgXRQbOzJpmNjKYeYAp9cHH+XiQdYmhRxzHbm6R
	scRJUihftvSfJgF6tA4CiXOtidrnew6XN2b0P2IJgcNq3z5BxrVq2kulbjlRIJ4x
	3YtqWhGAXMhyUunvjKrLfjHm+U=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	Ishtar.hs.tlinx.org
Message-ID:	<56044EBD.8090904@tlinx.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:27:57 -0700
From:	Linda Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Greg Freemyer <greg DOT freemyer AT gmail DOT com>,
	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin potentially corrupting permissions?
References:	<CAGpXXZKUQtAbrQ80VDHZhy0aZtzG+5fDB7bcYz-kwQ3Kgx6ueQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <560366EE DOT 5020207 AT tlinx DOT org> <CAGpXXZJeWs33BJi7qROduZEhTx1pXXXseTbfXu+QP8+cf_r5hQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <56043BA4 DOT 7040405 AT tlinx DOT org> <CAGpXXZLrourgJ39=n4M8kEKeF7tT3fCTafvLaSfZuHh62ffmUA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAGpXXZLrourgJ39=n4M8kEKeF7tT3fCTafvLaSfZuHh62ffmUA@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Greg Freemyer wrote:
> 
> Totally logical, but not accurate. )
---
	What does it say if you do an 'lsacl' on "." 
(the parent directory).  

	This is a local file system?  NTFS?
Do you have process hacker?  Maybe the writing process has a different
integrity label or such.

Process hacker lets you see what the integrity labels are on files,
but to see what they are on files you'd have to d/l another util.
(chml/regil

>
> - cygwin is not properly maintaining the permissions when it manipulates a file
----
	May not be able to ... Windows trumps cygwin.
MS-regularly screws w/windows, .. it's like switching to a new
init system every month... ok.. maybe not quite that bad...


> 
> Either way, I would really like a solution that doesn't involve a
> manual chmod for every file I create via the normal Windows interface
> and which I want to work with it in cygwin.
===
	I can understand that -- that's sorta why I haven't upgraded
my cygwin lately -- She spent alot of time solving a problem that didn't
really appear on my system, so changing the whole security system -- well
I already know that cygwin doesn't respect existing standards or sources.
(overwrite windows mount points created -- and is shipping a login that
zeros your environment -- even when passed switch to not do so -- effectively
wipes your windows session -- forcing users to copy sessions from static
files to get around the problem.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -