X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=B7mRWQ4diCPeS5ji
	2UeIVDQFanbXDwnIQzdkfkfuN8R5i/obzNyUHOANs1QgaoQDd/sTztdYG2DzxTBb
	A0Vfjw1g7PrAA8U40GjpU8lGKY3waDC+DJSyDsmA1LmA3/MFS9DwCXVMHv/FuThZ
	yA1YmXz90Dx0/NyDHQPUQHZXEG0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=JkVF7n3EU/lXWeUFJxWkpf
	1joC8=; b=QA3FBsgGSdf1EIIUTOq6vGoWoCRgPJ+neQ7NLWz3r7NHjz5LnNt1Rp
	7Gj6g/BL75hdYxiF3bENfjluGp555PAkvCRGrEWjpJtLu1ru5M6HJfvNtmAWuw7a
	mpIM2sBWwNZGezl6BrCZNiUajGO4zr4wd8nkedkaJ1OKjwqDup5ok=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wi0-f181.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.194.204.195 with SMTP id la3mr9097979wjc.77.1442867511042; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: Question about old win32 api
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<A8FCEC4C682E094AAB49CE0CE41E28EA18502B88 AT EXCHMB06 DOT is DOT l-3com DOT com> <1442854377 DOT 11704 DOT 18 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <A8FCEC4C682E094AAB49CE0CE41E28EA18502C2E AT EXCHMB06 DOT is DOT l-3com DOT com> <1195136399 DOT 20150921222509 AT yandex DOT ru> <CAOC2fq-WaBg1aug_iG92Z3B7PvYD+EmpsWhCdS7HHDW0JZMijQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<5600691F.2090204@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:31:27 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAOC2fq-WaBg1aug_iG92Z3B7PvYD+EmpsWhCdS7HHDW0JZMijQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 21/09/2015 21:55, Michael Enright wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Andrey Repin  wrote:

>>
>>> Upgrading would be a pain,
>>
>> Who said that?...
>>
>>
>
> PMFJI,
>
> Between Cyg 1.5 and 1.7 the command-line interface changed on the "nc"
> utility and, from the point of view of someone who at the time did not
> read this list, it was a silent, breaking change. So I would not be
> surprised if OP had a situation where recompiling an old version was
> best.
>

the change in nc had nothing to do with cygwin
change between 1.5 and 1.7

https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-announce/2012-05/msg00015.html



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -