delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2015/08/17/09:41:35

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=
g3bVLrfVYWtBDfImuIrd9R3MdZEhJhbFDmMpYKfkT0cEzN4ymHplOBe8hIKYt8fb
1AHHWMsl5HSqMooK0ExN4atNG5wGzDeJ5Ddf3yTF46Ae7k/YpL889JSosUnR1wTa
RuFUJsrhY1gMmy89jUMRLDyHMEsAYboyuuZuS12H16U=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; s=default; bh=VwR3LF
UOuenxb3/EWnQymxtRT5g=; b=IpK6vIzYADa+qkOjd8YiC8NTdp+EpgGWMMOGVS
P9uZZ1pUsqEdtRHMSYLxkyxsuy9oFGzGM0USpA4RP9ANxu6MoRPwQKyRi7LXVqE0
g88WMu2zvvfFlWJR+/aNGPBHKOVlruke+dpNBGQ0Bv1Uk4c66Np3qnK7dZRFNz10
0VKP4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtpbg65.qq.com
X-QQ-SSF: 000000000000009000000000000000A
X-HAS-ATTACH: no
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: webenglish7t1439818865t819453
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?Zm9laG4=?=" <foehn AT foxmail DOT com>
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?Y3lnd2lu?=" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Cygwin R usability
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:41:05 +0800
Message-ID: <tencent_12266CBA39850A13141D72C3@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t7HDfVQb031738

Hi there, 

I read that there were issues (mainly with the BLAS library) in the Cygwin port of R (http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/cygwin-R-2-14-0-build-fail-td4035136.html). And till today the official R site has not been supportive of the Cygwin version of R (https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#Cygwin), while there are number of people using this "unofficial" port regardless of the caveats showed in the official R site (http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=R+cygwin). A thread on Stack Overflow was posted asking about this "chaos" (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31962159/cygwin-r-usability) but nobody seemed to be able to address it fully as they are not Cygwin developers. Therefore I send this mail to the insiders and ask specifically for the current situation of the Cygwin port of R:

-) Has the BLAS issue been addressed in the current Cygwin port of R?
-) Beside the BLAS issue, is there any additional problem? Can it pass the building test?
-) In short, is current Cygwin port of R (v3.1.3, 64-bit) usable in serious sense?

Thanks to the efforts for porting R to Cygwin and more thanks in advance to anybody responding to this mail,
Foehn

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019