X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=mHP5o8XVX4ZiBuJYILh2BK73XLxpQ/TxpXJRantIDTlbKGL/EwZSI
	G69DR6PHD0FyTvg4mogJ/Dqo4n2iRe/v95CS7tmLjg6vAyPIDUTp/OkYmuAAIZ65
	LnEyo10UXZ78mbY+eS/e0RdpTJoVJglwvaDQ9oJJQBl5i47vh1aQ3U=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	bh=Sih+vogdNYl9eu3XEtyY/xmfmWA=; b=y6v6Dm+lMQKqBb+t/GJsYaBFJ4PN
	3bnp921zfepVFr0uMjzTOPyN73Uc9QIheApuPujbjM9HHu+wM+zjl741ZuaiY7nE
	Ff69W7lMyvuF4FTHLxXFC+282Q7O2v7sP8K/V6/OsbHiyVEYd2hTJQEjwIrxKthw
	K5AYgc68xLGJaLA=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	plane.gmane.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT NexGo DOT DE>
Subject:	Re: Shares with strange ACL settings
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:27:48 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<loom.20150817T102111-51@post.gmane.org>
References:	<20150812152601 DOT GL13029 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150812T172703-7 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150812155817 DOT GN13029 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <878u9g9y6b DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20150812183220 DOT GO13029 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87vbck8h92 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20150813163302 DOT GB28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150813175302 DOT GD28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150814082959 DOT GE28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150814T125223-728 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150814134552 DOT GG28349 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87bne8d1tm DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Achim Gratz <Stromeko <at> nexgo.de> writes:
> The output is correct now for a SandyBridge dual-core CPU with
> logical processors (aka HT) and an IvyBridge dual-core CPU w/o HT.

Another IvyBridge dual-core w/ HT looks also correct.

However, for the Piledriver Opteron 6328 in the 2012R2 server, Cygwin
reports 8 cores.  Linux on the other hand would report 8 processors on 4
cores (SMT, like HT on Intel).  I don't know where you get the topology
information from, but Windows' task manager reports 4 cores with 8 logical
processors and two NUMA nodes on this machine.

Regards,
Achim.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -