X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=pBJlAsAjOVx8HpS3eu0f+YwccX81CljW880DeBKZr3I
	yquvJiy9ysh0VqYR3YIiZ5IUEIz3me87ic5kYbzoh2xAWufRx43e9MnSUeI08N/W
	nz6+jkEv9ASJVLVL/hpryySRryZMZF8YrdySRfFPcFcrFqzD7QPvQUQ9FExL6Ngc
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=rUkiJLtWTfr/9oh9zggCbGqmY44=; b=tu5oD4A5BFVrTlbMb
	57EjeyKiIjjeA5VJ7x9t3Fq8QLEz8jVU8TJtQ5bUy3gZw86v5EkKHiunhsKICA6X
	MpE1LnObPz7RlsvXp3ktX8vUrgooX+V4+4Rb4TcyzN/0oSnJaukI2T7sJ4DrzCz2
	Ay/EBHs2Pn21lgSNmYgL5Wakd4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wg0-f48.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.194.134.74 with SMTP id pi10mr2692285wjb.99.1434114855955; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 06:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<557ADB1C.2090207@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:14:04 +0200
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin on W7: stalled scp (openssh-6.8p1), lost ssh-scp-pipe data
References:	<trinity-adeb9d42-adb8-49d3-9cfd-88c9bd411123-1434113975685 AT msvc-mesg-gmx017>
In-Reply-To:	<trinity-adeb9d42-adb8-49d3-9cfd-88c9bd411123-1434113975685@msvc-mesg-gmx017>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 6/12/2015 2:59 PM, Theodor DOT Kazhan AT gmx DOT de wrote:
> Hi Corinna, all,
>
> in case someone is still as curious about it as I am, it took nearly one week and 3433 attempts:
>
> $  while true; do DATE=`date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S`; echo -n "started: $DATE"; scp -v -C -o BatchMode=yes tester AT 10 DOT IP2 DOT IP3 DOT IP4:"logDownload_m/TEST.txt" . > scp_$DATE.txt 2>&1; echo " - finished: `date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S`"; rm -v `ls -1 scp_2015* | head -n -3`; sleep 5; done
> started: 20150605_170918 - finished: 20150605_171220
> „scp_20150603_182927.txt“ entfernt
> started: 20150605_171225 - finished: 20150605_171531
> „scp_20150603_183041.txt“ entfernt
> started: 20150605_171536 - finished: 20150605_171842
> „scp_20150603_183156.txt“ entfernt
> . . .
> started: 20150612_113735 - finished: 20150612_113845
> „scp_20150612_113347.txt“ entfernt
> started: 20150612_113850 - finished: 20150612_114003
> „scp_20150612_113502.txt“ entfernt
> started: 20150612_114009 <== this ssh-download is stalled
>
> ... to reproduce this issue one more time on my 2nd env (cygcheck attached to my previous email dated 05. June 2016, 17:00). This time, a 32k buffer (the 16k-blocks B003363 and B003364) is lost:
>
> $ sdiff -stw40 <(cat TEST.txt | sed -re "s/(B0.....-N001024-)/\1\n/g" | cut -d- -f-2) <(seq -w 1 1 94796 | sed -re "s/.*/B0&-N000001/g")
> .                   >  B003363-N000001
> .                   >  B003364-N000001
> .B094793-N000001    <
> .B094794-N000001    <
>
>
> Any advice is still highly appreciated, e.g. on howto debug into Cygwin/Win I/O-APIs, read/write functions, pipe implementation... For much more details, please refer to my previous emails.
>
>
> Thanks and BR,
> T.
>

Hi Theodor,
Question: last cygwin 2.0.4  or previous version ?

Maybe is no relevant for your case but there were some fixes

In theory during tests a 64K buffer should be faster

Regards
Marco



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -