X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=fNA6Tod
	cKur3HunR+TWyL/cWKpekZRNDDNkepvbGDN5e6QtzO6PPkxzpOkNViv2e6gVOgHb
	0lBSJ6swAd/X3FZQn4gezQYVbSLnvGFSFcEEJIzpOp1gx2b37jgc3eZOsl0vTdgL
	G93gIB3zfNie1stSdQVal/CSZXcmcvwA+iW8=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=/EWebhIa9iZBf
	6/v5UlVk9idlvY=; b=NqwTD21aCntaDg/bgTBfpOTX/frI0KiNt/YNT84NyzD1d
	2JOmbBwHKNq6UyXKhpvt1sjGOsFCIWpgIhu6VqmEeAIwI8asVNb6e5idaRzJt7tO
	b6xkkG6K2C6nn+YVPCTUkvVjv0//NWY5Wdb/uKPYELmJjUQkC5Dx+jfI2HL4Mo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wi0-f179.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=wg2Q2slpEHQnV06/QsTJfQ0q0SAGhdk13bjFgZ3WErM=; b=bAEIirzKynRz13f8txPvp2MHlmhSEcpMbAMIq0XNRVAO5TnjT3ZUBwUNbm5M+/52AT 0kOTu6jybuYqJlUvbRVg2B6Az/zT1AcczhaFrGyxgmYhUh51ijA9S9/wGMTOFZEADmPh lVsr570mxvJwj1opDJGRheST1M//mRJ2riLbZVUSYVs6nuMtId2gzUFUkF+FWhPYCM+1 TZB/XyE52bRe8tysWtMhxF7927KTVrGzopCjsk0Cv8Sxjvx4lF3cvBCtdDCnCq8CvsI/ zQ+CiyA8A7XgWD1pnEfmCEjVvuxtgSjGKPWs+/bfzDjpWW0qAg8Esc9Rpgj7q1vHRQ1x gaQA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQlcRTZv/JuH8Pbo1qnLxS45esaaYLUjCTE6CgRtaCtvRo0nANPYN8R6gKV0bn4FrXnrCeWm
X-Received:	by 10.180.36.51 with SMTP id n19mr4577877wij.20.1433826187978; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 22:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20150608200737.GW3416@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<CAJ1KOAidxNn99KCUNHCbGCvOc=51vz8uzo5zag_0FEYj-yyFPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150608124159 DOT GE3005 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150608132103 DOT GJ3005 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJ1KOAiz8rV33jmCuLHj9pkLBD+3w3N+7+eEQ6cZwScAkcsNyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJ1KOAh5Sqy2Zhag=zddULcZFTa759uyr4uXY_7QGhv85w_2Og AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150608154334 DOT GA13266 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20150608T180517-501 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20150608171813 DOT GA15150 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150608200737 DOT GW3416 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
From:	=?UTF-8?B?xLBzbWFpbCBEw7ZubWV6?= <ismail AT donmez DOT ws>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:02:47 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAJ1KOAg7E-M1P8Z3A+F8EMQDMCLJTejbBomHz=jwD-O51KXw2w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Corinna Vinschen
<corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> On Jun  8 19:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun  8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> > Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:
>> > > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name
>> > > > instead of <defunct> for non-Cygwin processes?
>> > >
>> > > That should work, it just needs implementing.
>> > >
>> > > However, I'm just mulling over another idea.  It's probably even
>> > > possible to return the comand line and cwd, as long as the calling
>> > > process (cat) has permission to open a handle to the requested process.
>> > > I'll toy around with this a bit...
>> >
>> > Does that mean that top would finally be able to show Windows
>> > processes as well?
>>
>> Looks like it.  My patch seems to work nicely, it just needs some polish.
>
> I uploaded a new developer snapshot which implements this.
> Please give it a try: https://cygwin.com/snapshots/

Seems to work here, cheers!

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -