X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=j/bCnmww0kYHBkqOD0v5lEveTU0c58CUSw5tCjR5Dd203OqZFI+kd
	bEOxTY1Hl5eul12Ze7AufMuAIE5sz7Aw6oqbeRUEGfUoeKBftjpiE8yblsFmyrsC
	c1n+AXjB7l37ftmQ+ZC6kHdYSnh1nZkN+Gj1j06xLHuZX1Tjw5XKfk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	bh=AJd4tFbyNA8hz/33nMLzAVvnfn4=; b=ArwHlqhYmtrbB1aqCbiFYSNj4C2M
	qdop5vUCzirAxxZqXYmd/UqJkKwT5fJvzIIvonc6pW0Agzx8ZDnO0DwG+DThhaU1
	xnQSODYi67c5Cm9yglNRYnW9QwOBk/TazZI6d6Py8OGv6XrgWHNvflvx6eSiAWW0
	tPraEtM1BxoE64g=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BASE64_LENGTH_79_INF,BAYES_20,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	plane.gmane.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT NexGo DOT DE>
Subject:	Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression
Date:	Mon, 8 Jun 2015 16:10:20 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	1
Message-ID:	<loom.20150608T180517-501@post.gmane.org>
References:	<CAJ1KOAidxNn99KCUNHCbGCvOc=51vz8uzo5zag_0FEYj-yyFPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150608124159 DOT GE3005 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150608132103 DOT GJ3005 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJ1KOAiz8rV33jmCuLHj9pkLBD+3w3N+7+eEQ6cZwScAkcsNyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAJ1KOAh5Sqy2Zhag=zddULcZFTa759uyr4uXY_7QGhv85w_2Og AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150608154334 DOT GA13266 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t58GAkq9016207

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:
> > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name
> > instead of <defunct> for non-Cygwin processes?
> 
> That should work, it just needs implementing.
> 
> However, I'm just mulling over another idea.  It's probably even
> possible to return the comand line and cwd, as long as the calling
> process (cat) has permission to open a handle to the requested process.
> I'll toy around with this a bit...

Does that mean that top would finally be able to show Windows processes as well?

On another front, I've recently uĆ¼streamed a patch for a Perl distribution
to use /proc/pid/statm because ps from Cygwin doesn't implement a switch to
show the vmsize information.  The maintainer of said distribution said he
was expecting a BSD ps before anything else and didn't like the Linux /proc
interface a lot, but it seems we might want to move to a more modern ps
implementation (Linux ps uses /proc under the hood, AFAIK) when the
underlying functionality in Cygwin has that covered.


Regards,
Achim

- Raw text -