delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2015/06/08/07:49:44

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
default; b=hWMtXYgEFdp3sgANweLpSRAnw5xjoWW4qnIaj6XhpiVf/qHExHtmV
hd9LI+DERihfWRijzI7FD9jsVaSNK9qTIPaHF9zWzAykel1/aGOQlJysqp72z8EF
p3tuQq4BPdfxoYxHL5TCbFjzHj70kceHx2gmrI+xSEaXcJGtR/isu0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
bh=EDqY2W+ne2AUhVLcmbz41FKdlLQ=; b=REETZN2M9IQSZnqYuaB0IyiRhmXx
gqiwZMlpeAjEqi0H7w2akt7r4qGdrBzgAf+tMoISDrLQtqSjm6WTJ4wmTMwcxipt
HW/NsG/xv8Ghos1NdoyWLB+XOiBU1DpNHFwfeP6eAPt7/HGgMV5xVX0vF1nZXZCm
8NEafMzYCop91/w=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 13:49:24 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: Rich Eizenhoefer <riche AT microsoft DOT com>
Subject: Re: From Microsoft: Windows 10 Console and Cygwin
Message-ID: <20150608114924.GA3005@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Rich Eizenhoefer <riche AT microsoft DOT com>
References: <BN3PR03MB1430B88AED4339821C7D95BEB4D50 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <20150502133833 DOT GB12723 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <BN3PR03MB1430C0816A9D41BB051687A4B4D20 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <1433098286892-118602 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <20150601082456 DOT GG4308 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <BN3PR03MB14303BAD46376DED807CFA2CB4B60 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <CAJ1KOAiG-VV2heqYSNSjwCb=s_pjxoxKaGY3SnDiy4E20yvOWw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BN3PR03MB1430F49F8839B66558779F3AB4B50 AT BN3PR03MB1430 DOT namprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <556E01FC DOT 6060004 AT redhat DOT com> <CAB2911B-10C9-409F-B0A4-A88C3C9EB0BD AT etr-usa DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAB2911B-10C9-409F-B0A4-A88C3C9EB0BD@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jun  2 14:49, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> >=20
> > On 06/02/2015 10:37 AM, Rich Eizenhoefer wrote:
> >> Can you provide more detail on changing isatty function to support Cyg=
win PTY's? I need to be able to support the request in our backlog.
> >=20
> > As long as we are wishing, it would be awesome if Windows natively
> > supported ptys as actual objects, instead of making cygwin have to
> > emulate them on top of other objects.
>=20
> In my ignorance of how ptys map to Windows console objects, I held off fr=
om asking for this when Mr. Eizenhoefer solicited ideas, but this is what I=
 thought of at that time, too.
>=20
> In other words, this notion of =E2=80=9Cvirtual terminals=E2=80=9D is alr=
eady implemented multiple times, following a standard that specifies the ex=
pected semantics =E2=80=94 POSIX =E2=80=94 so why not just do that?
>=20
> Why, in the end, can Windows *not* have ptys?

That's a good question.=20

Basically Windows console handles are kind of one half of the equation.
They don't follow the expected semantics but they are what native
Windows tools know and expect.

Opening up the other half of the equation, the server side, without
forcing to start conhost, might be enough to allow emulating POSIX ptys.

But I agree, real ptys with POSIX semantics would be cool.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=JyUO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019