X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=mo
	lCMO3fzMjYhTxdc7EnrckAkTeD3myStgPocOn1ThneICuxqx6aNMaU39I71WEcr3
	NPo4X9FFRqsNO03m4+nnBqxVt00/XRphXw/SGQq+wrwkjv8X6K+Iq+WfdFcgNxEk
	cY35gvBKW496XHxi1xDK3szBNpSzDGPrOaPEbHQ3I=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=WpHRRDAT
	Y6S94lqwlpztIi5YUHE=; b=nTatvIdEgR68ZjISSInQWNrvMpR6MhI9p0yAWnD/
	sAQvOHWunl7o060Vjb/MZsKH5GO3vShlt3yBsjPxMTfbxonLZhwFfh1Cv2AzPBvo
	87PbuHBhxPpcWrMMswkDvfArthIFYR5M/yDv/Z9gyK7YWsY4LrZQ1lCJ0v2JFv7r
	LsA=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wg0-f45.google.com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.86.135 with SMTP id p7mr27840711wjz.89.1430586194147; Sat, 02 May 2015 10:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAOC2fq_4n_AXbTCEzL0herVbHhQ_mC=somEnhv-=mduiRnKWBw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<554279F0 DOT 5040505 AT towo DOT net> <5543090D DOT 9030409 AT gmail DOT com> <55436D3A DOT 2050200 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <5543BEAE DOT 3000703 AT towo DOT net> <CAOC2fq_4n_AXbTCEzL0herVbHhQ_mC=somEnhv-=mduiRnKWBw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 2 May 2015 19:03:14 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEhDDbCyLRY3PRjhWqgsW25-Dez2pmJ9KZOexXEKwFwtTXxXzg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [64bit] cygwin-devel headers broken
From:	Csaba Raduly <rcsaba AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Michael Enright  wrote:
> When changing from compiler to compiler, even if it be just an OS
> point version upgrade, implicit header inclusions go away all the
> time. As a developer, I just shrug this off as one of the trade-offs
> of choosing to develop in C or C++, which lack proper module systems.
(snip)

Please don't top-post.

No need for a trade-off. Include-what-you-use (
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ )
will tell exactly which headers are needed, so there's no need to rely
on which header includes which.

Csaba
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -