X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=uo
	oRjH9DpwNgiDYuI6ruzMwVU0BPY9FxadstjEm/cwP7O64arCThnT5j/80KDSH5Mk
	017b0B/HzPVHI+2cpECjvYguZg6RQNZ+yQ6pk8EWDy3MUy+hQEcx7041jl7Rv6LP
	PY9BndorvY3Q5I6DVlXLQTIp1zlXoLx6mGpPMsj+Y=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=kwc353zt
	ERaPckeqjRYmaiaGvWo=; b=TdCXgFrH9Jmnwf1pouiPhvbnczCYYEN0IGJBQUEp
	PkaZ9cXxmzhKYagrj8E/VmmrbQpnO1JRR26/7LxdHikK7PtgrAmeXs9pWJWNQ/Rk
	qiDh54xRKY7DAAqIEZiJlTD648agcxxru+TJUSRu/0jYH/RdFaYaOwip0EMltbJ0
	aok=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-la0-f52.google.com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.43.74 with SMTP id u10mr5188729lal.90.1428750708963; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 04:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20150411094414.GC19111@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20150410100703 DOT GA4401 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87lhhzcarc DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20150411094414 DOT GC19111 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:11:48 -0400
Message-ID:	<CADi7v6L1QrigKn0-ca-XXD2hSZxT5LTvZL2=xAR5+qrcBCEVZw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [TESTERS needed] New POSIX permission handling
From:	Bryan Berns <bryan DOT berns AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

>> >   That means, even if SYSTEM or Administrators have full access to the
>> >   file, the POSIX permssion bits will not reflect that fact.  And while
>> >   other users get access denied based on the mask value, SYSTEM and
>> >   Administrators will never get access denied based on the mask.
>>
>> If you want to put this to better use in larger settings it would seem
>> preferrable if it was possible to define a list of users to treat this
>> way in fstab.
>
> Nope, sorry, no configuration for this.  Either it's handled without
> any exception, or for SYSTEM only, or for SYSTEM+Admins.  But either
> way, we're doing it the same way on every system.

Damn.  I was about to reply with Achim's exact same thought --- like a
file in /etc with a list of SIDs.  I can empathize with Corinna's veto
though -- having a hundred tweak-able settings in Cygwin is
unmaintainable for the general populous.  I may apply a local patch to
extend this ability myself because Cygwin has become rather unusable
for users with home's on our network drives (given all the programs
that attempt to do sanity checks on group perms).

That said, I appreciate what has been integrated --- it will help in
several scenarios.  I will test the release this weekend.  Thanks for
all the hard work!

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -