X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=Wo9zK2Rad46k3fvcbrlfKqbten7cbn4datDYqJf7Avu
	kg9PD/474iete1evA7OI723V9gULaWR8VFRlpELE3C1myqdiuhFxALXtUbxktcgI
	7Dy5+fD76RKH12YVcjYlYS34uWiIHJDDAdU4xxQ9BLTDZ8F+2kZYHvJKnudrcu6k
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=zMXqvY+YbecXyAuu0mbpmzOKP+8=; b=Yhom67zJgnEI1JmJI
	ZqBWJKuPHVI3s90rZCRNYtVInqHsNwYbWjattCYPqTLrr0ny/6LT1KTC1X7UJp60
	lx0sy/g1ppWzNMt8utdo6KpKdKaDb1G6DewPlW8OS9WY/DCqr1F/MuIGyfBoJIk2
	Xmg2CRcKks0y5l8SN/58n7m60g=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	conuserg003-v.nifty.com
X-Nifty-SrcIP:	[121.93.68.199]
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:20:46 +0900
From:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: TIOCPKT mode of PTY is broken if ONLCR bit is cleared.
Message-Id:	<20150325202046.f6b6f40c0245145760d72391@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<20150323100823.GE3017@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20150228143653 DOT ab0a6bf854db294105e1d5f3 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20150228135947 DOT GZ11124 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150302210508 DOT 1be5c1ed4753508431842913 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20150318145854 DOT GC2368 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150319074942 DOT 6c18c8fe0199037f028687dd AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20150319083451 DOT GA8398 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150320191232 DOT GJ2368 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150321104031 DOT 9dc198eb8aa4e7652e0a7a51 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20150323100823 DOT GE3017 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Hi Corinna,

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:08:23 +0100
Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:

> With this out of the way, I'm just looking through your patch and it
> looks good to me.  I have only a few minor style nits:
> 
> +                     rc ++;
> 
> No space between the variable and the increment operator, please.
> 
> +                 if ((get_ttyp ()->ti.c_oflag & ONOCR) && get_ttyp ()->column == 0)
> 
> Please try to keep lines <= 80 chars:
> 
> +                 if ((get_ttyp ()->ti.c_oflag & ONOCR)
> +                     && get_ttyp ()->column == 0)

Thank you for checking my patch. 

> However, due to the changes in fhandler_tty.cc, this patch doesn't
> apply cleanly anymore.  Any chance you could resend it (ideally to the
> cygwin-patches ML) diff'ed against git HEAD?

I will post a revised patch to cygwin-patches ML soon.

Thank you in advance.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -