X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Cihx5XWcFytcERrw0SDfk1Z28W4cZUcZbGBtsNIUSCIwTjpt5CWFm
	46ngUK9RaBbyDMxywPYoc0qADxMokCNxNErMe/nSx2H36hqd2s/yUe+MZRkHxsV9
	jCNmUsNeJPeoZ9ZJIH1BWXWJcPMCg2cxDOivZSdjn5ajnhvBW2K07M=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=nomHV45U9B79gq+/ZwUuOMj7ie4=; b=ZRFW7Hk5v8ytpOG+WznP3OfTIgzJ
	rlCncwUpjrgPte0N0zqtK64iwMxBuu5rkW+npnyO4VzQCEMDp8S8ZGYIq94Nr1EU
	pwRah0yZiuhSwZL1E94LfB8Q2OWjS6QlsQ8pxsSgfgofrkJo8mtTtYFEKNMMhvxD
	ii0x73rHaATRmHs=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:13:48 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Too Many Permissions Stripped In 1.7.35?
Message-ID:	<20150302111348.GI3213@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<54F37C9F DOT 1020900 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<54F37C9F.1020900@gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--D6IIOQQv2Iwyp54J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar  1 12:54, random user wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.  Seems we've maybe miscommunicated a bit tho.
> So not meaning to argue, just to try to clarify, let me try again:
> [...]
> I'm only wondering if showing the group mode as r-x in the last case
> above is best, vs continuing to show the group as ---, the same as it
> appeared before the chmod o+rwx.  Either seems reasonably accurate
> from p.o.v. of actual security since there can't be group members
> other than the user itself so the group can't be carrying any actual
> new permission for anyone.  But chmod o+<whatever> having a visible
> impact on the group bits seems surprising.

I got your point.  Please try the latest developer snapshot from
https://cygwin.com/snapshots/


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--D6IIOQQv2Iwyp54J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Syil
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--D6IIOQQv2Iwyp54J--

- Raw text -