X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=lPx8dr9G8TdYVddtceRofANSt38Vtoac97slb1NhFfx
	VGMkdQ4SvEOnYzuPwIWahLQqiuDt2rXo8QfRGdKJrsICUEQ97zXM2WR/6L5gjDOL
	IhIu26HdUzuZ1eKcXZd9rIqSncBO9mQTqNZHV193cp9HFNd/ic/n96McyMIVErwA
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=58Mmw9nElpK6/XSd1fe53buUdPU=; b=O3QBM4pPOGIOhEhQO
	7PH23bNL3UYM2TmM1wXBLTYgmj+4aFfmu01cNy5yYehWw8AHb9ey6FP3eN4n5tCf
	AyN25Si/esmqMo3EBYwsGDuek+l3GIf80iezkZpi+CfQmHqBRU0cy8CoPVjUZdeD
	Ym7EhR9XX556ILyTBIGzTHMSd4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wi0-f175.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.180.126.69 with SMTP id mw5mr13319847wib.12.1425096364925; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:06:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<54F13EA8.9060609@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Feb 2015 05:06:00 +0100
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Performance problem with gcc 4.9.2-3 on 64 bit
References:	<cm61fadkltbqshdmtiil4nb50b0gf1n3qg AT 4ax DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<cm61fadkltbqshdmtiil4nb50b0gf1n3qg@4ax.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2/27/2015 5:49 PM, Bengt Larsson wrote:
> Below are two benchmarks that explore maximum floating point
> performance. loopm6 is double precision floating point and loopm6fp is
> parallell single-precision. They are manually unrolled multiply-add
> loops.
>
> I used to reach 2.8 and 11 GFlops on these. Now I only get
> 2 and 6.
>
> If you explore the inner loop with gcc -O2 -S you can see that it seems
> to use few registers.
>
> If you run them, there is a parameter expected. I use 30000 - 50000.
>
> gcc 4.9.2-3 on 64-bit. I use gcc -O2.
>

May be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -