delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2015/02/25/13:15:58

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date:from:to:subject
:in-reply-to:references; q=dns; s=default; b=qlqopaYeeBMB55qvM8k
+Kwwuym00bz917Iu+XdyPzuThr1kNiDw6uBvKup7rCM1f1CxHJhx9yTg3tMgSuMW
ynpsAvFultOfbLygCYm1rUy85+e3vS1mvFjWhIIz6Yk0jHiL937nTB699nJvI8TA
jPgHADtC+pcIzm48E7eOSpo4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date:from:to:subject
:in-reply-to:references; s=default; bh=OSpSDYnIPgF9GgvGKoQXsFdiS
0A=; b=a4nVjt7w9WGd3GUrawVaEEtQMdXoP9pHeIWEuwf6nqfq25lnJc2jx5q/3
BeLsz35AB0f6kUWlg7m97X1SzQgOidZFctYnE0c03tMFa7PyTmk/4O3KGrIOX1X0
QWaO9d8dRpaRW9PCrBFeUzQ1JZMO05Soa4t6+R6eTlIdtN6Tv8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: Yes, score=5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPAM_BODY1 autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: sneak2.sneakemail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <23247-1424888128-167679@sneakemail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:15:23 -0700
From: "John Hein" <3fbmqnhaz4 AT snkmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: slow startup after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20150225085650.GV437@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <3EA1D0B4CA4540DEB0782E6C1D038E3A AT Tamar> <20150224211358 DOT GO437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <13639-1424819039-568511 AT sneakemail DOT com> <20150225085650 DOT GV437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>

Corinna Vinschen wrote at 09:56 +0100 on Feb 25, 2015:
 > On Feb 24 16:03, q2t2hzmwuk AT snkmail DOT com wrote:
 > > Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin-at-cygwin.com |cygwin_ml_nodigest| wrote at 22:13 +0100 on Feb 24, 2015:
 > >  > Hi Roger,
 > >  >
 > >  > On Feb 24 19:55, Roger Orr wrote:
 > >  > > Hello Corinna,
 > >  > > It seems slightly faster than the previous patch and I've not noticed a
 > >  > > downside yet.
 > >  > >
 > >  > >
 > >  > > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW LCLDN-DEV24 1.7.35s(0.286/5/3) 20150220 15:47:55 i686
 > >  > > Cygwin:
 > >  > >
 > >  > > ~37ms to run echo.exe from Windows command prompt
 > >  > > ~60ms to run .\id.exe -a from Windows command prompt
 > >  > >
 > >  > > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW LCLDN-DEV24 1.7.35s(0.286/5/3) 20150223 21:02:38 i686
 > >  > > Cygwin:
 > >  > >
 > >  > > ~35ms to run echo.exe from Windows command prompt
 > >  > > ~53ms to run .\id.exe -a from Windows command prompt
 > >  >
 > >  > That's a nice result.
 > >  >
 > >  > However, I don't quite understand this result for the older DLL.
 > >  > Weren't you reporting >4 secs as startup time from 1.7.35?!?
 > >  >
 > >  > On another note:
 > >  >
 > >  > I just uploaded a new developer snapshot (2015-02-24).  This snapshot
 > >  > should improve mkpasswd/mkgroup or, generally speaking, enumerating AD
 > >  > accounts, a lot.  Can you give it a try?
 > >  >
 > >  > While you're at it, does the new snapshot still stop after 3.5K accounts
 > >  > even though you think there are 8K accounts?  If so, I'd be interested
 > >  > to investigate this further.  The reason is, while testing my today's
 > >  > performance improvements, I stumbled over a bug in my code which also
 > >  > resulted in enumerating less accounts as desired.  So I'm not entirely
 > >  > sure your problem isn't related to a bug either.
 > >
 > > That mkpasswd symptom was reported by me
 >
 > Really?  This is the first time I see your email address on this ML, and
 > there's no name connected to it, so I don't even know if you're usually
 > writing under another email address.  At least a forename would be nice...


Bah... sorry, you should get the name in this response.


 > > (well, maybe others, too).
 > > I'm running it again, but it's still very slow, AFAICS.
 >
 > It shouldn't.  It performs only one LDAP call now per 100 accounts,
 > If that's still slow in your environment, I don't see any way to
 > speed this up any further.
 >
 > > I'll report
 > > how long it took when / if it finishes.
 > >
 > > New issue with recent snaps:
 > >
 > > Running the 20150224 (and *23) snapshot produces the following on Win
 > > XP (yes, I know) if cygserver is running:
 >
 > Sidenote: I'm contemplating to stop supporting XP end of this year.

I'm thinking it's either related to XP or _something_ with the
particular XP box I'm using (when logged in on the domain, I can't
disable many group policy things or temporarily inhibit AV, so it's
harder to find/eliminate something to pin blame on - certainly may not
be something the latest cygwin is doing when running on XP in a
"large" AD domain).

I went to a win 7 box and the 2/24 snap makes mkpasswd -d run in 33
seconds and enumerates all 8016 entries.  37 seconds with the 2/25
snap.

And win 7 doesn't get the 'wrong arg.type' error with the same 2/24
cygwin1.dll for whatever reason.


 > > $ /usr/sbin/syslog-ng -F
 > >       1 [main] syslog-ng 5776 C:\cygwin\usr\sbin\syslog-ng.exe: *** fatal error - Fetching account info from cygserver with wrong arg.type 2
 >
 > Try the snapshot I just uploaded (2015-02-25).  I forgot a tiny, but
 > crucial statement in the code when I changed that code two days ago.
 > That should be fixed now.
 >
 > > tcsh still taking a long time here (also XP - 3+ minutes with
 > > cygserver running).  bash & dash much quicker.
 >
 > Works very quickly for me.  Problem is, I don't know anything about
 > your environment.  Are you working remote or in an office?  How many
 > groups are in your user token?  What is the result of this funny
 > little statement Dennis created:
 >
 >   cmd /v:on /c "echo !TIME! & C:\cygwin64\bin\mintty.exe /bin/echo "test" & echo !TIME!"

On win7: that command takes .17, .44, .48, .53 sec between 1st & 2nd time stamp

That had 'db' only for passwd/group in nsswitch.conf, no cygwin procs
running including cygserver.


On problematic winxp box:
    [passwd, group, db_shell: 'files db', 'files db' & /bin/dash]
      16.83, 17.03, 24.80, 28.79, 27.99, 27.39 sec

    [passwd, group, db_shell: db, db & /bin/dash]
      23.51, 27.91, 28.78 sec

    Any trials using /bin/tcsh without disabling complete.tcsh take "a
    really long time" (TM)... from minutes with 2/25 snap to 10s of
    minutes with 1.7.34.  I mentioned this in another thread (and
    strace sometimes showed 5 minute gaps around forks).

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019