X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=auU0D/1RBGlKDkKJtQonrHCWid3jUp3gvHCGpNyPnQpp8SecdFhrE
	e/RJhAyf19cmyd6c2FRfLqGM2g0PK0sh+ctK1Zdd8mLpjrhMuzRHI2sKk/P5bw/6
	35BnJWPvmYBYQhb9p00FgKLmYACiKcaevy1nlmpwE3Av5FZa0uoTdk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=qwxJXJyIUJPM602PjuKyF3hz/DY=; b=lAh28ffabuAeF0CQW7tz2Wa+Xa3z
	iirI/A12dq+hNgmpkaZ+eS7ZrxmC3QKXZmwpwHS5PBYPs5Ut/lgxC4zhIipblk1e
	QpiKFcWr+VblOIt7kDcPGyYzAiWQBeGYzQN4xr7lXkflvHOSqSvelQYXUfuwOJ/5
	mqtnLqc7LGUynIc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:16:39 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Teach gdb how to unwind cygwin _sigbe frames
Message-ID:	<20150224211639.GP437@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1424715301-13516-1-git-send-email-jon DOT turney AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <20150223212427 DOT GB437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <54EC98B4 DOT 9050003 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<54EC98B4.9050003@dronecode.org.uk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--gBMNUjqROSlRgKnE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 24 15:28, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 23/02/2015 21:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 23 18:15, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> >>I really wanted to do this by adding some DWARF CFI to the generated si=
gfe.s
> >>file, but there doesn't seem to currently be a way to correctly describe
> >>_sigbe's frame using that.
> >
> >I was wondering about this already.  It seems weird if the CFI stuff
> >doesn't allow for a situation like that
>=20
> My understanding is limited, but it seems to me that it only describes
> register unwinding, not unwinding the state of an arbitrary memory locati=
on.
>=20
> After writing my patch, which only unwinds one sigstack entry correctly, I
> went back and had another go at writing the equivalent CFI, which I think
> should be possible, but I still couldn't get it to work.
>=20
> I'll take another look.

Maybe the binutils folks can help?

> >>So instead, write a custom unwinder for _sigbe frames, which gets the r=
eturn
> >>address from the sigstack.
> >>
> >>Implemented for i386 and amd64.
> >
> >Cool.  Really.  But, shouldn't that go to the gdb-patches mailing list?
> >
> >>4. This unfortunately ends up hardcoding into gdb the offset of sigstac=
kptr in
> >>the cygwin TLS area from the top of stack, and so will break if that ch=
anges.
> >>Hopefully that doesn't happen to often.
> >
> >It happens too often to be ignored.  Wouldn't it make sense to add
> >a cygwin_internal call to return tls offsets or addresses, the later
> >if the argument is a pointer to the stack or cygtls area?
>=20
> That's not going to give the right answer when remote debugging.

Uh, good point.

> But the offset is, of course, encoded into the _sigbe routine, so the bet=
ter
> approach is probably to extract it from there.

You mean scanning the code and extracting the offset right from the
opcodes?  That's an... interesting... idea.  I would probably object to
it, but can't be bothered, considering Cygwin is doing the same with
ntdll.dll ;)


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--gBMNUjqROSlRgKnE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=HIkH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gBMNUjqROSlRgKnE--

- Raw text -