X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=daviYLAWzAVAU8KxNH+Hyc5T055+uVLtBN2TJ5bQVT48R9TeSXhwp
	4VfumeIXis+YP3FFIhdNfJvKxiKnHIg1j+NN3aS4XD9QyEhR4a23IoAvpcFBFQXo
	81BRjnjYd1av3ZdzL+e2O5IhefKcgp4qA16+wcNUDbDisvaj8YQ2Fw=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=o61Ynr7j1gpRkWON2XdeOmc8EVw=; b=w99FX/KwitYh3pWpAivSyn1xoBjO
	IkLxKLCX2naXoMSezJBfJCLc2tiwadlXP7oz5Jz510x9q4OY4FwktQYcn9pzRBvG
	dEJDCdjAsCgK09F65qhlhkzxVzVWytXa2VkKEEYQAJqq92/xikyMtMgVa96VA1dI
	kj0sGdJ7GfIyrtw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:27:39 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Updated: setup.exe (Release 2.867)
Message-ID:	<20150216092739.GY7225@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20150205180713 DOT GZ2635 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <54D4216D DOT 5050509 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <20150206102304 DOT GD2635 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <54D93708 DOT 7070404 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <54E16031 DOT 3000101 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<54E16031.3000101@cisra.canon.com.au>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--EmW68jKGQIhj8inv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 16 14:12, Luke Kendall wrote:
> On 10/02/15 09:39, Luke Kendall wrote:
> >On 06/02/15 21:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > "Of course"?  In fact upset (the script creating the setup.ini files)
> > > reads the content of md5.sum and uses the checksums in there if
> > > available to create the setup.ini entry.  It only computes its own
> > > checksum if the md5.sum file is missing the info.  So, afaics, in bor=
der
> > > cases in which a file gets replaced, there is a chance that the
> > > setup.ini checksum is incorrect as well.  In theory that's not suppos=
ed
> > > to happen because replacing a distro package should always include
> > > bumping the subversion, thus creating a new file and just removing the
> > > old one.
> >
> >Hmm, that's interesting.
> >
> >I based what I said on my experience; I've tried to work out how it fits
> >together by looking at the files we get via rsyncing from mirrors.  It's
> >not like I've read some reference that describes the Cygwin packaging
> >and release process and procedures (I have a feeling that such a
> >reference would be setup.exe's source code, by I may also be quite
> >mistaken about that).
> >
> >But the mismatches have been so common, and persisted so long, that I
> >(perhaps wrongly) came to the conclusion that relying on the md5.sum
> >file was bad, simply because in all the mismatches I've seen over the
> >last several months (I'm guessing something like six), setup.ini has
> >been correct and the package md5.sum has been wrong; and the error has
> >persisted for many, many days.
> >
> >I suppose another possibility is that we *think* we're rsyncing nightly,
> >and we're not, and it's only the automated consistency check that's
> >really running each night!  I'll check into that possibility.
>=20
> Just to close this off: this was indeed the answer.  We had rsync-ed -src
> and debuginfo packages at one point, but they were being excluded those f=
rom
> the nightly updates.  (I was unaware of that.)
>=20
> So I was wrong.  I apologise for the mistake.

No reason to apologize.  But it's nice to know the problem is known
and fixed.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--EmW68jKGQIhj8inv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=MItA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EmW68jKGQIhj8inv--

- Raw text -