X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=yN+VWKV6W8hk/QsD/PfSOdN2tHhsSaErArWE5uHZP3V
	JC5a1gvgIEESKCjlOnwLGT3N08+j9Dq8VU6KZLGe4z6yQtPuV/l6VkNWWnW29hIP
	JwF88ZiAtheY8gwD2yE0FQOYCAghqYlAuLGIvIw1kkKfJyZHAQsTdyCHQTgUsEmQ
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=Xh+PU8h7/ikHIG5J8qbW5O+rRbw=; b=vjofVDEt7EECFUEzQ
	dEMpHCt/pcIeKvThsvdeLblYJ4IQWnAOTT3ta0ZNmAmJtUS8iVKzoIHXdVtUi7Re
	fmOnfqkwJtSW+jab4mGsUZYD0OFaJhUodnlnwcIdk7Ws77Axfsrx+vm0fRIdp4Cy
	bebqUmBbLFlsCecO4nz3cux9Ok=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wi0-f179.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.180.94.163 with SMTP id dd3mr7500453wib.82.1422374910039; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<54C7B7F7.7060009@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:08:23 +0100
From:	Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Although advertised on a different Cygwin mailing list ...
References:	<dd0fd62c5d4dc7742bfbe128b3c824f3 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20150127121758 DOT GA2584 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20150127121758.GA2584@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 1/27/2015 1:17 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 27 12:11, Houder wrote:
>> Corinna wrote (on a different Cygwin mailing list, which I am not
>> supposed to read):
>
>>
>> Which I did. Satisfied user here. An user which never uses the
>> keep/current/experimental radio buttons, though (which I consider
>> superfluous).
>
> Thanks for testing, and that's a good point.  These radio buttons
> are rather... weird.  I think it might be a good idea to remove them.

I use it.
The only issue I find with them is their peculiar trinary logic.

In reality we have 2 questions:

  current/experimental
  update/keep

When I need an experimental version of cygwin and there is a
experimental bunch of perls (for example)
it will more easy to "keep" and upgrade only cygwin than
"update" and deselect all the tons of perls

Other layout pitfall (IMHO)

"view" button should be on the left not on the right.

"search" is in reality a "filter" and could fit better
near  "select packages"

> Thanks,
> Corinna

The new logic works fine.
I have a bunch of custom X libs for debugging purpose and
they are not automatically select for "downgrade"

Regards
Marco


PS: the cygwin web site seems very slow. Is it just my connection ?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -