X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=DIluSIwHpTbrS2i9Y8Blqutoz6WsJbGx3HKuMaaDn3f2x+Diu4Ttr
	UkJYvioj6z1emEvSsdMzMJfdNu7Dx+ujSRK/HCEbplpi55A9QS6cH1+j5DJUDE8G
	ldB0qrS5Ood6spdcII69cdKNXbpfvc/MUsszh+anlISznWlvErpNjc=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=O9Hx0peZVWCTPci0qpPiiaCAH6M=; b=MenZJMvuuhjTIikfYSY23IP0+Dny
	yK8Jbb9v8jnDgvidDdlm1gM9SOvJ8dL9KC6XRZWcJyVNWCU/AhBP2X1dd3k9LY7l
	HcXCQlXFUfEC9T7AbTc6XCz1KwARmQWM5KS5kuQXYZo7t35LU3T+ODzZXloJLPDg
	m+uVd42LVcYBGgg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:14:35 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.34-005
Message-ID:	<20150122091435.GD19127@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 20150120164242 DOT GA23732 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1E0AF396-18FB-4402-92C2-A46FD9F5E80F AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1E0AF396-18FB-4402-92C2-A46FD9F5E80F@Denis-Excoffier.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--d01dLTUuW90fS44H
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Denis,

On Jan 22 00:21, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> On 2015-01-20 17:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >=20
> > I released another TEST version of the next upcoming Cygwin release.
> > The version number is 1.7.34-005.
>=20
> I compiled this one successfully on CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 (W7 with Cygwin 3=
2bits), but on
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 (XP) i get:
> make: *** INTERNAL: readdir: No such file or directory.  Stop.
>=20
> More precisely it fails when inside the ./cygserver folder:
> % make -d |& tail
>      Prerequisite '/tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/src/winsup/cygserver/transport.h' =
is older than target 'pwdgrp.o'.
>      Prerequisite '/tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/src/winsup//cygwin/cygserver_pwdgr=
p.h' is older than target 'pwdgrp.o'.
>      Prerequisite '/tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/src/winsup//cygwin/cygserver.h' is=
 older than target 'pwdgrp.o'.
>     No need to remake target 'pwdgrp.o'.
>     Considering target file '/tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/obj/i686-pc-cygwin/winsu=
p/cygwin/version.o'.
>      Looking for an implicit rule for '/tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/obj/i686-pc-cy=
gwin/winsup/cygwin/version.o'.
>      Trying pattern rule with stem 'version'.
>      Trying implicit prerequisite '/version.cc'.
> make: *** INTERNAL: readdir: No such file or directory.  Stop.
> make: /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/obj/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/cygwin/version.o: Fie=
ld 'stem' not cached: version
> %
>=20
> Like advertised, it seems to have something to do with the internals of t=
he make utility, therefore i
> restarted the compilation anew with 'make --no-builtin-rules' (or '-r') w=
ith the same result. In the
> cygserver folder, i replaced
> CYGWIN_OBJS:=3D$(cygwin_build)/version.o
> by
> CYGWIN_OBJS:=3D
> (since version.o is already built anyway) with also the same result. No f=
urther idea for the moment.
>=20
> The last snapshot (20150119) has the same problem (again, only for XP). O=
lder snapshots i don't know,
> but 20150113 was OK. I cannot formally exclude antivirus and all such kin=
ds of things.
>=20
> Probably the bug-make mailing list would be more appropriate. Hope this h=
elps though.

This doesn't look like an actual Cygwin problem.  There's no difference
between XP and W7 inside of Cygwin which would explain this behaviour.

Maybe it's just XP getting old? ;)

(idle musing: maybe it's time to stop supporting XP...)


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--d01dLTUuW90fS44H
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=tE33
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--d01dLTUuW90fS44H--

- Raw text -