X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=aPQJTWojq6/xJDhDfv1JdC7i1LLue
	N5zD0Kn4Sykr6TySsN1uU8h6UsPTsYenerZeEKKhbOeBK3sHhjLog5VkZBGIT1k4
	fTHh02d7z6k5Q/Mhps2H18Zb2qgv14VlEAxwIt6NJqnZ0jAWOMcIGXPF12OMI5T+
	zKtIhqDn0uhjkE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; s=default; bh=AiYyghkqxToypYj7DuJKUa3q/RI=; b=EFK
	DHEtxEhDGKAa1ap7L5YI7srGvjh18AnWuEaOqogamOnaKD7lZOM5R0WPgg/x3yfW
	3oWruLLO7AvZoEeTwqKjfaquZ7b1ExeXMaH6MbgdVr1UppC3kXJzzQOTLWpuQD7+
	B0Prs93NlRyUFLpOJ6Hex6f7tH2XxfU+/oO1j2Uc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-yh0-f43.google.com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.236.14.100 with SMTP id c64mr25028857yhc.139.1418718474585; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:27:54 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:27:54 -0600
Message-ID:	<CAAXzdLVjDKA79OFANt7G_uD33Sc471nK72go3Q2Nu28AJz7JDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	OpenSSL as Base package
From:	Steven Penny <svnpenn AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

I feel that OpenSSL should be a Cygwin Base package. I looked at these distros

    Debian  http://debian.org/CD/live
    Fedora  http://spins.fedoraproject.org/lxde
    Puppy   http://puppylinux.org
    Porteus http://porteus.org
    MSYS2   http://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2

and they all come with OpenSSL pre-installed. The only trouble I see with this
is currently Cygwin OpenSSL has Perl dependency. Debian has resolved this by
maintaining 2 Perl packages

    http://packages.debian.org/perl-base
    includes /bin/perl
    1.4 MB

    http://packages.debian.org/perl
    includes /bin/cpan
    4.2 MB

Of course the Cygwin package sizes will be different, but it shows significant
space can be saved for users who do not need a full Perl install. This does fly
in the face of my previous protestations

    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-10/msg00563.html
    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-06/msg00279.html
    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-08/msg00152.html

However by my calculations this could change the package sizes to

    current Cygwin perl  14.0 MB
    new Cygwin perl-base  3.5 MB
    new Cygwin perl      10.5 MB

I think most people would be fine with having a small Cygwin "perl-base" in the
"Base" category.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -