delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2014/11/25/12:44:14

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
default; b=oGBLLga9aG05AJwmdfZyVsmU5iudCVhDfHGIVw7EGCEqKR4XvZDmv
vaoho4ttRvbmjO8BXAzxDGQ0tZlYhL6MHjnB3n+Mt/iGZ0/yIUyWzH7LQzrmzkN8
kl9vLEo3dwWJQ96QQrJ/ylEMdKvglP/oKCQHefJzxOBkuSC8W8HsOI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
bh=9mUqeRtddb02MhZKjlvhFQaMD4s=; b=gZjweqMNTEc8J7jzJ9FuD8zXI50n
QqVv5cjipBzzwNTC8QhlTC2LUO1rUAPt9mn1YqgPhlsncFSRq0z0H2rkHZKbPn68
A1QoCQkMC28fT0E51u2/whZ/0QKMHQr+UMS5ZpIxOys70FkBwkt6R7+S/mrjfQ2O
vR0U/MtI6DHTl1U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:43:54 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: occasional failure to look up
Message-ID: <20141125174354.GU3810@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA2807362157 AT 046-CH1MPN1-043 DOT 046d DOT mgd DOT msft DOT net> <20141118152211 DOT GZ3151 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA2807362297 AT 046-CH1MPN1-043 DOT 046d DOT mgd DOT msft DOT net> <20141118155809 DOT GD3151 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA2807384C70 AT 046-CH1MPN1-041 DOT 046d DOT mgd DOT msft DOT net> <20141125151928 DOT GQ3810 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA2807385AF1 AT 046-CH1MPN1-041 DOT 046d DOT mgd DOT msft DOT net> <20141125163833 DOT GA8118 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA2807385B5E AT 046-CH1MPN1-041 DOT 046d DOT mgd DOT msft DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA2807385B5E@046-CH1MPN1-041.046d.mgd.msft.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--UrGtnQA9R6QcIU0f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 25 17:09, Habermann, David (D) wrote:
> > Two things to keep in mind:
>=20
> > - It's not actually clear yet if it's a sidHistory entry or some SID
> >  created by another mechanism.
>=20
> > Even if it's sidHistory, it may be *very* old.  Did you work at the
> >  company already back in NT4 times?  That might explain the sidHistory
> >  entry and the total lack of files still having this SID in its ACL.
> >  As far as I know, Microsoft suggests to remove the sidHistory entries
> >  as soon as they are not needed anymore.
>=20
> Yes, I guess I'll have to date myself now.  I've worked here with the
> same user ID since 1975 (full time since 1980), so I span basically
> the entire non-mainframe computer era.  So what you are suggesting is
> quite likely, and it would not be surprising for clean-up work to have
> been neglected.  A quick look in our AD shows numerous things such as
> "Legacy local groups" and "Legacy Mailboxes".  One concern I have here
> is that when I dig down into AD to "DC=3Ddow,DC=3Dcom,OU=3DDow
> Users,OU=3DEmployees" and find what I believe is my current active
> record I find a record with "U074036" (capital 'U') whereas the record
> we saw as my "UID" earlier in this thread was with a lowercase 'u'.

Hmm.  That should not be a big problem because user and group name
comparisons are case-insensitive.  Hopefully everywhere in the code...

> I
> found this by searching for sAMAccountName=3Du074036, and it is the only
> record found by this search.

Does this record have one or more entries in the sidHistory attribute?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--UrGtnQA9R6QcIU0f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=MyEs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UrGtnQA9R6QcIU0f--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019