X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=XQ2V3JKY/UT0gSAV
	g+CTi4IFBgi9PyTEb5y8YSKVY3++Ppcpzsqy1b2kTtUJI/qpK0Bls19RI7ZVUS8v
	O69xzjA6qjhR+WF3uePZct88IDdYSYHOJJaqBdd5TGiuG6E/A/J2bpFcQDpgteYQ
	SQ9upf1Mm95gXWybO+kyshij/UA=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=5t42bvsKt837Fu5rqiO+rt
	y49lE=; b=sdpTfhxzdTJnJufUCFMFUUbABP9nL/R2AqcxhZJ2ggwcdYbxueR6Tc
	sLYxChCF6MKHs9Q1a/YRDvL+xpfpAFeY9TcynvQN1vtZy01SpD/Q2NG/WJLNr7/b
	s/6z/KuqjJf0nh96U1UHXkFWH8ABgqXjBDFC8UokoFbWtWojOgHjc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtp.ht-systems.ru
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:18:35 +0300
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<253902392.20141117111835@yandex.ru>
To:	Shaddy Baddah <lithium-cygwin AT shaddybaddah DOT name>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: rebase db perms seem too restrictive
In-Reply-To:	<5469682A.6090501@shaddybaddah.name>
References:	<5469682A DOT 6090501 AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Greetings, Shaddy Baddah!

> I expect that there wasn't any explicit reasoning behind this, but
> rebase creates a db with permissions that are too restrictive. To me
> anyway, as I cannot see any danger in the db being readable by all.

> This snippet describes it:

> <snip>
> $ whoami
> sbaddah
> $ od -c /etc/rebase.db.x86_64
> od: /etc/rebase.db.x86_64: Permission denied
> $ ls -l /etc/rebase.db.x86_64
> -rw-rw---- 1 portapps None 86020 Nov 11 15:34 /etc/rebase.db.x86_64
> </snip>

> I've attached an untested patch that would allow at least world readable
> perms. It would be appreciated if it was applied :-)

There's no reason or need for this file to be world readable.
Even more, I think the fact that there's group access perms is a consequence
of shallow translation of ACLs to POSIX permissions, given the group name and
the fact you're unable to access the file.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 17.11.2014, <11:16>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -