X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to
	:subject:date:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=PyY3Yv+T3q0V4pZK
	RGzHeKPlMIiHlsFbKCUlpqcI/Zj6DsRLFrcgm9TubSfZsEBh7AXlMrERSV1rRHtS
	hgGSt+b/2BiXK0GL/Flu0c8XLGyyk0JfX36TAYTDFWx8hi+AyxEJFDEZra3eZ4yH
	DuZuTQbBtHaZf3VxTSkKRjMaoJM=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to
	:subject:date:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=0pC0ogcUfnfUNt49096kx0
	8dHdo=; b=NAJyc7cAnPjpfOfB9dw5SFbgzn7rTC0pUsmFGKGUSdM96M7VIBCfUt
	u+mxPtOgsoJRp919uq5/SATo7XuGZVoW7CNxUFrd+0T3eaG2hixf/hGS4xBhFjbk
	94lzVnjQbPXPppdFyeTZ6SahLOLFqvYHZIRDpnHzB/6DIgAPwjoek=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPAM_SUBJECT1 autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	BAY004-OMC1S28.hotmail.com
X-TMN:	[7ydj61Hvngk0imxPjAJpN5S6lAVZv5g+]
Message-ID:	<BAY169-DS507DB2170B09396FB2EDF4A78A0@phx.gbl>
From:	"Tony Kelman" <tony AT kelman DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<BAY169-DS2686C452E98CEE170F3245A7B00 AT phx DOT gbl> <542AD9EE DOT 6050700 AT gmail DOT com> <542AE57F DOT 2000106 AT cygwin DOT com> <BAY169-DS38D1002C668CBF6EA5B33AA7B80 AT phx DOT gbl> <542BC3A6 DOT 3000402 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<542BC3A6.3000402@gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: package update for cygwin CMake
Date:	Sat, 15 Nov 2014 23:47:29 -0800
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

>> The same number of CMake unit tests passed with an unpatched bootstrap
>> straight from the upstream sources, so I didn't get the entire rationale.
>>
>> -Tony
>
> PathCygwinToWin32 was using a deprecated cygwin_conv_to_win32
> that is not present in x86_64 version of cygwin.

I've updated this set of patches for cmake 3.1.0-rc2 (I can post the builds
if anyone would like to test them) at 
https://github.com/tkelman/cygwin-cmake
As with 3.0.2, there is no difference in the number of CMake's self-tests
that fail with unpatched sources from upstream vs applying Yaakov's set of
patches (with my updates so they apply to the latest version). I don't
see anything using cygwin_conv_to_win32 in 3.x, there are some uses of
cygwin_conv_path which are disabled by Yaakov's patches however.

I'm still willing to adopt the package, it appears Bill has been too busy
to upload a more recent version over the past 6 weeks.

Yaakov (or anyone else), is there any way you can provide test cases
that would fail without applying each of these patches? I can pursue
adding such cases to CMake's test suite and working to get the patches
incorporated upstream.

Thanks,
Tony


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -