X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=AY2DnTebI+w6f0drgoNLwiF8OsPFR
	lE8vHEYaIyysLMysUgFps+VvA22/hBNc/fKwV4ZPMnwOgwvb34gthwW/Gs+CYAKo
	RhOGSULKUTO1rBOTDcrYBC36H/eBMfLJEsHWYeGZZkeMoVVyS90ABcBFBeuq+0Vy
	6f7z5v6y265N34=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=PKCST8js752pSxAMp+NGbFy9HmE=; b=U/g
	mY81xloW843SWw/x6p25HJxue2Dob7RnyVl3AMk+J71LiafhU1kr8AregfqWqiHN
	whpH6/PCzNEhxC+fST9za2TayEvPN6KG8eltk7lPKcmkNXUgivzgIfxmR3BNK4UP
	pPwEVxwlO+jLBXBRuuH7JOAEP4BhpTn2zLSmj4LM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
From:	"Habermann, David (D)" <DAHabermann AT dow DOT com>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: FW: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.5
Date:	Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:57:10 +0000
Message-ID:	<C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA280731F508@046-CH1MPN1-043.046d.mgd.msft.net>
References:	<C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA280730A864 AT 046-CH1MPN1-043 DOT 046d DOT mgd DOT msft DOT net> <20141106165331 DOT GI28195 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20141106165331.GI28195@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved:	046-CH1MMR1-004.046d.mgd.msft.net
X-EOPAttributedMessage:	0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report:	CIP:65.52.44.158;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(428002)(189002)(24454002)(5423002)(199003)(106466001)(81156004)(77096003)(4396001)(55846006)(95666004)(23676002)(6806004)(99396003)(44976005)(106116001)(101416001)(68736004)(69596002)(107046002)(2351001)(46102003)(120916001)(105586002)(50466002)(77156002)(84676001)(31966008)(450100001)(62966003)(47776003)(104016003)(20776003)(21056001)(22756005)(97736003)(92566001)(76176999)(22746005)(92726001)(86146001)(66066001)(64706001)(110136001)(107886001)(50986999)(54356999)(2501002)(33656002)(87936001)(86362001)(2656002)(79686002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR0101MB0872;H:mail.bsnconnect.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en;
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted:	BL2FFO11FD047.protection.gbl
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered:	BL2FFO11FD047.protection.gbl
X-Microsoft-Antispam:	UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam:	BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0101MB0872;
X-Forefront-PRVS:	0387D64A71
Received-SPF:	None (protection.outlook.com: dow.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Authentication-Results:	spf=none (sender IP is 65.52.44.158) smtp.mailfrom=DAHabermann AT dow DOT com;
X-OriginatorOrg:	dow.com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id sA6HvaW9002723

On Nov  5 22:38, Habermann, David (D) wrote:
>> It would appear, after a bit more digging, that this problem is
>> related to some timeout issues.  Most of the time the ssh login goes
>> rapidly, but occasionally it takes quite a lot longer triggering the
>> expect default timeout.  When setting the timeout substantially
>> longer, the reliability goes up substantially.

> Such phases wher checking for an account takes a bit longer just happen.
> I don't see that Cygwin has this really under control.  Local caching
> should alleviate this somewhat.

Seems that this is not taken care of by caching...I have cygserver running first, prior to anything else, and what I was finding was that the problem was intermittent, 20 rapid-fire tries would result in 2-3 random failures.

- Raw text -