X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=US7DBc
	+L13VFSMo8j7v2gDkgpKbb7iwrw7E8ZzhodollYpTskASvwhwMBjOFlIp/2Fxca2
	RFG1WiSc1CeL8dMuw3BhSBhdpUHYH4PK6lYl5rHjc8atOHhZ4GtannovDPjCDTDl
	LskNWVTLbwE2O+71/zOv5+0rmISBoJnYLTa1I=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=VZJlA3W7D4Gc
	W3QNmQ969wCO6Ug=; b=Q3GRijh0CKc7v4ovaaQNvSXUlAnpf7CFtpjYsYZOv99i
	mJ9cBVS+j28BRtro/sbr0KwYwxp5HXIweEN1HjLxTWa/Br6VMZKuJ8E2OpVD8j/j
	sozP9zyd07WhyA4jhN1l3iFeGGgGEcVAa/zN3ILQIZNjzxVoIfD6G3UAlPzBRjA=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-pa0-f51.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.66.65.137 with SMTP id x9mr49040464pas.0.1415093477899; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<54589CD9.4020308@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:31:05 +0800
From:	JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20140503 FossaMail/24.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc packaging bug?
References:	<5457F7C2 DOT 9090204 AT cornell DOT edu> <CAJ1FpuNbx-CZDOd2a0WPV2F5hfWQtbNAV7AFUuD1CPXBefL6Yw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJ1FpuNbx-CZDOd2a0WPV2F5hfWQtbNAV7AFUuD1CPXBefL6Yw@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

--wlqWCKtonjXuLCDNQ5sFcMspcdV0PCjpT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11/4/2014 08:48, Doug Henderson wrote:
> On 3 November 2014 14:46, Ken Brown wrote:
>> The setup.hint files for gcc and its subpackages now say
>>
>> curr: 4.8.3-2
>> prev: 4.8.3-3
>> test: 4.9.2-1
>=20
> Setup-x86_64.exe is reporting that cygwin-devel is a dependency of
> gcc-core now. Is this an intentional change?
>=20
> Doug
>=20

Yes, cygwin may split into a devel package in the future. It is a dummy
package for now.



--wlqWCKtonjXuLCDNQ5sFcMspcdV0PCjpT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=VU2q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wlqWCKtonjXuLCDNQ5sFcMspcdV0PCjpT--

- Raw text -