X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=n+kO3MvgkP3wYpGPiWkgDn19/351+GZCwva5JG4Q6KXv+1RgMK9d2
	XU4RJOJJh1SRjh2oq9eNTuZocoAHrJh8E71u+duF9DBHggQLDJfzEhGhfMlat04F
	XFEbkBsPpYQyHDtNNncc9ySgefdu7HKgvqxrwQ4C0KDCVeURAozNtI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=RsVRieKP4DZyoClrJ0fBD4hmUp4=; b=cbIL4dg/n1eB9p8TeZ4+PRrp1hu+
	dPMac/8Tb4b0wNxWLwEQXieLI8sTWutqb5V+M+HQ3Ilxjip3eEv+pWrAEM3iK8Ge
	CCtR6kxeiY56uhYnJznjdqaRQAsLnK+v77dG3bsF73we9SnBumESzMjFASnCyxGl
	edWIOUDluxMUXnc=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:22:08 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.4
Message-ID:	<20141103162208.GD28636@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1415026765 DOT 23338 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <352f4f69b0e3afa90974308099249e90 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<352f4f69b0e3afa90974308099249e90.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov  3 16:09, Houder wrote:
> > On Nov  1 17:58, Christian Franke wrote:
> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >I just released a 4th TEST version of the next upcoming Cygwin releas=
e,
> >> >1.7.33-0.4.
> >>
> >> There is an older regression in mkgroup.
> >> A separator without a preceding domain name is printed for the builtin
> >> groups:
> >>
> >> $ mkgroup -L THISHOST
> >> SYSTEM:S-1-5-18:18:
> >> TrustedInstaller:S-1-5-80-...
> >> +Administratoren:S-1-5-32-544:544:
> >> +Benutzer:S-1-5-32-545:545:
> >> ...
> >> THISHOST+HelpLibraryUpdaters:S-1-5-21-...
> >>
> >>
> >> Introduced in mkgroup.c CVS 1.54, April 2014:
> >>
> >> @@ -415,8 +341,8 @@ enum_local_groups (...)
> >> ...
> >>           printf ("%ls%s%ls:%s:%" PRIu32 ":\n",
> >> -                 with_dom && !is_builtin ? domain_name : L"",
> >> -                 with_dom && !is_builtin ? sep : "",
> >> +                 mach->with_dom && !is_builtin ? domain_name : L"",
> >> +                 mach->with_dom || is_builtin ? sep : "", <=3D=3D=3D=
=3D Hmm.... :-)
> >
> > Thanks!  It would be nice if you could send a patch to cygwin-patches.
> >
> >> BTW: mkgroup should possibly also print the extra builtin groups which=
 are
> >> now reported by getgroups(), for example 4(Interactive), 11(Authentica=
ted
> >> Users), ...
> >
> > Doesn't make much sense.  Generating them via "db" is incredibly fast.
> > There is also one person on the list (sorry, don't remember your name)
>=20
> Me, perhaps? (Henri) ... https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-10/msg00491.ht=
ml

It might have been you, but it's not that thread.  I'm referring to
some discussion a few months ago when I asked for testing the new
stuff in the snapshots.  My memory for names is really bad, sorry.

> My "nsswitch.conf":
>=20
> passwd:files
> group: files
>=20
> db_enum: files
>=20
> In short, no problem at my end: id shows the short list (as before ...)

The question would be:  What's the problem with the long list from id?
Enumerating the builtin accounts is very fast and you shouldn't have
any downside.  On the upside, *iff* there are files owned by some
account not listed in /etc/passwd or /etc/group, the additional "db"
setting would still allow to show the ownership correctly...


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=8MRU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm--

- Raw text -