X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=xPErLKZoFeVKtyaf9tJev+COfc51cVQ7NOE85u8QToC0k3SlftYvA
	IgY0IZZIjHSn5b1Am9bI5qKJn2GIDJEVOJW6p0IMJAgTY4BKzuFEwI5qO+z8menU
	S8+2aCcCNGz4lVn9G9kalxcbqbOhHNcX43TXj3TfmyIb90HviiDh04=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=Uu4v6wwgDDh8uhne2wzMZ+SK8T4=; b=v9ju5G7pvzqHBSIZv68Ox2OucCsf
	SGRqUBhIMQUKe1l63qGxXBw50kmjqjYBPjS6fAeGU0gkDSlu0FAIvoikSSlldvmo
	9Ybh2m/8GIVokkpaIJPLIScbmf0X/Y1GW0s5vFlW4STMnbGbAAK1haCkI5Kq0hAL
	/7IlLiw2gt+ywOM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Sat, 1 Nov 2014 18:34:58 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Base 64-bit Cygwin now requires Perl?
Message-ID:	<20141101173458.GK14051@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<53A1F336 DOT 3030509 AT breisch DOT org> <20140618210042 DOT GB27055 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAAXzdLWmUveAeQ-MSN3wN=6URLCNeH_7F2XpwoEYSgQckA153Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5453E47D DOT 40308 AT cornell DOT edu> <5453E987 DOT 2080102 AT cygwin DOT com> <5453F570 DOT 3060405 AT cornell DOT edu> <20141031210419 DOT GC14051 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5453FE19 DOT 7060206 AT cygwin DOT com> <20141101155113 DOT GF14051 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5455052A DOT 70309 AT cornell DOT edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5455052A.70309@cornell.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--GBuTPvBEOL0MYPgd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov  1 12:07, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 11/1/2014 11:51 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 31 16:24, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >>On 2014-10-31 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>On Oct 31 16:47, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>>>Sounds good to me.  I'll repackage within a few days.  Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>We need to make sure that the existing dependencies to texinfo
> >>>are still correct afterwards.  22 packages are affected:
> >>>
> >>>   _update-info-dir
> >>
> >>info
> >>
> >>>   a2ps
> >>
> >>texinfo-tex
> >>
> >>>   autoconf  all of them
> >>
> >>Not sure this is needed.
> >>
> >>>   automake  all of them
> >>
> >>texinfo, although this is a soft dependency.
> >>
> >>>   cygport
> >>
> >>info (minimal build environment)
> >>
> >>>   docbook2X
> >>
> >>texinfo
> >>
> >>>   indent
> >>
> >>Not sure this is needed either.
> >
> >The only reason I can think of  is that indent comes with an info file
> >/usr/share/info/indent.info.  But that would mean we'd have to add
> >dependencies to the info package for all packages coming with an info
> >page.  Analog for packages containing man pages a depedeny to man-db.
> >
> >This might go a bit far, I guess...
>=20
> Packages with an info file don't automatically get a dependency on texinfo
> (in the current setup).  So this must have been done manually by Jari for
> some reason.  But I think packages with an info file do get an automatic
> dependency on _update-info-dir, so that will bring in the new info packag=
e.
>=20
> In any case, I was thinking the new info package ought to be in the Base
> category anyway, for the same reason that man-db is in Base.  But I don't
> have strong feelings about this.

Sure, info in Base makes sense.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--GBuTPvBEOL0MYPgd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=3CH6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GBuTPvBEOL0MYPgd--

- Raw text -