X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=lXzdt8Ib4LY2FHvVM+dD9qXmn502Rkavy1qDAsB/TTRcansyZKjUR
	uF+Ig6bb+BwoCFIHPo+P0e4yJSgHJvVCNk54Rx0OvEBB9vyMGx4Arkr6EVMvd8LY
	TAQak+JhSsu/FgroVf4ebExqrlG8uQVZ8PY2RNNLNbi+9TWJ8oVeVg=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=Nbg/i+0LHVz8SmF6nkZbDPzTAF0=; b=vPhDS8VyJCS/Kq5zpCwAwntR4/KJ
	1hmQZWww7xupujj5diFRdXizZwP9yCdk1c4cTb+X8xEtWs52UrqPqKaRCpuW/Fa1
	U2IjDF68Tq9HyNfSwxYUtIMx4iyoO0JfiJjPklDJ322uhMg/X2u36F7LaRemlNwA
	Cm2SOzEv+IZ/oM8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:02:09 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.1
Message-ID:	<20141024110209.GJ20607@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 20141022092323 DOT GH32374 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <A0FD00D9-6DFB-4E3D-9FDE-44BC1CAAEEDC AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<A0FD00D9-6DFB-4E3D-9FDE-44BC1CAAEEDC@Denis-Excoffier.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--/0U0QBNx7JIUZLHm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Oct 23 20:06, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> On 2014-10-22 11:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >=20
> > - Drop the current working directory from the default DLL search path in
> >  favor of Cygwin's /bin dir.
> I'm not so comfortable with this one.
>=20
> I use
> PATH=3D/my/dir/bin:/usr/bin /my/otherdir/myprog
>=20
> There is no DLL at all in /my/otherdir (this is the very first place
> for Windows to look for DLL's, and i think that this cannot change).
> In /my/dir/bin, there is an updated version of a library also
> located in /usr/bin, for example an updated cygstdc++-6.dll (from GCC 4.9=
.1).
>=20
> Does this mean that, under this change, cygstdc++-6.dll will be found
> in /usr/bin and not in /my/dir/bin ? In fact, this is what i can
> observe personnally.
>=20
> Also, i don't remember that the CWD has an impact on where DLL is found (=
apart
> from being in PATH, and apart from being the dir where the exe resides).
>=20
> For a test i have commented out in cygheap.cc the line
> 'wcpncpy (installation_dir, ...' (and also the next one)
> and the old behaviour is now back.
>=20
> It seems to me that this change is a regression. Could someone please arg=
ue?

Hmm.  It's hard to do the right thing here, I guess.  I can see how
this is a regression in your scenario.  OTOH, your scenario is not
stable.  The directories in $PATH are the last ones in the DLL search
order.  So, your scenario already wouldn't work if your CWD is /bin
(or /usr/bin).

=46rom Cygwin's POV {/usr}/bin is a system dir.  For security reasons it
makes sense that the system DLLs in /bin cannot be overridden, unless
it's an installation issue which should be covered by looking into the
application installation dir first.

Having said that, moving your DLLs into the application dir is really
not an option?

Does anybody else have a similar scenario to cover, which doesn't work
anymore with this change?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--/0U0QBNx7JIUZLHm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=xGf/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/0U0QBNx7JIUZLHm--

- Raw text -