delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject | |
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
q=dns; s=default; b=Slme3eDPqtLDAY/N6a9pKiEW+o7ewl+tgRF0zcSkOY+ | |
sFX+yOQF/QJ52um5gf7gsikpC9mbRqHxIbOt48465b3+5/HqvMOod55qnox3t0f2 | |
zd915rePKqXY4VqcN4j8gzwMcBxgBBw4ttyxaixJq6lZB4Cwaf1mNCLMmu4RDRf0 | |
= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject | |
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
s=default; bh=9ulXSrbtIKm8l56ttUJImQ0WgZ4=; b=xRe0/wn21ODOXCYh5 | |
ClTYUsl7PiKaJR0JAFGcQO7GHk8PpBhp6kwB8LNzNDNhdNphn9pijwbWE5gX4naa | |
EOb6w1LMX+DWrDHqPexyiOnwafE9LYFG/JgQpjyAMalPocVrUx5EtBdkue/+CvrU | |
gbfmjGfdT51Vey73OEWwXLvoY0= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Virus-Found: | No |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 |
X-HELO: | limerock04.mail.cornell.edu |
X-CornellRouted: | This message has been Routed already. |
Message-ID: | <544965F4.207@cornell.edu> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:32:52 -0400 |
From: | Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Threads |
References: | <54450835 DOT 3050602 AT cornell DOT edu> <5448E6F9 DOT 8040005 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <5448EEBF DOT 3020706 AT cornell DOT edu> <20141023153730 DOT GC20607 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
In-Reply-To: | <20141023153730.GC20607@calimero.vinschen.de> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
On 10/23/2014 11:37 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 23 08:04, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 10/23/2014 7:31 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote: >>> On 20/10/2014 14:03, Ken Brown wrote: >>>> Or is there some other plausible explanation for "impossible" crashes? >>>> This can't just be a result of a gdb bug, because in at least one case >>>> the assertion can be shown to be valid by using printf instead of gdb. >>>> >>>> [*] By "impossible" I mean that examination of the relevant variables in >>>> gdb shows that the assertions are in fact true. Two ongoing examples are >>>> >>>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18438 >>>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18769 >>> >>> As a suggestion, you might want to also take a careful look at how signal >>> delivery is implemented in cygwin on x86_64 >>> >>> I had a vague idea that there was, at some time in the past, a fix made for >>> register corruption on x86_64 after a signal was handled, but I can't find it >>> now, so maybe I imagined it. >> >> Is this what you're thinking of? >> >> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2014-q1/msg00020.html >> >>> But if for e.g. the flags register was getting >>> corrupted when a signal interrupts the main thread, that could perhaps also >>> explain what is being seen. >> >> Yes, flags register corruption is exactly what Eli suggested in the other >> bug report I cited. > > The aforementioned patch was supposed to fix this problem and it is > definitely in the current 1.7.32 release... The ChangeLog entry just mentions the FPU control word and the XMM registers, but not the ordinary FLAGS register (or rather EFLAGS for x86 and RFLAGS for x86_64, if I'm understanding correctly what I find in Wikipedia). Did the patch also take care of that? Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |