X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=Y6zynJ1NqWEet4Tu0XXZBRdPx81kn
	qMaqj8xZaw1W6C0rm2s/+WD7josDRqvpFrt41g4wNywLr3JDLknRorHOyxXSSlFF
	/cAmVKdw/cZkCqL2UK4NFTVgny1FbuHqnTqGWI15JQbD+arJBrT1/LtwFSPWo1Lg
	93AgskdVzvI3gY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=+xBtqrVvGQd2e969GHwPWzqQzUU=; b=Sks
	f9FAvk5NxX3UYYm8Gjjg51OETV8MlN7Pqatcm7tsPGnmd/AqENsvd4x1kQvTZ5dS
	1681BR5802b3H/QcxsyplfWnnG0gbYW9gkgkhp0AqdCVgndOhcrKoESs0v236rfR
	vTKODUcEnFVYhdB4x34lzvF/Ya8LmIxyPMMAC9uw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
From:	"Habermann, Dave (DA)" <DAHabermann AT dow DOT com>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.1
Date:	Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:35:03 +0000
Message-ID:	<C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA28072F9229@046-CH1MPN1-043.046d.mgd.msft.net>
References:	<announce DOT 20141022092323 DOT GH32374 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<announce.20141022092323.GH32374@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved:	046-CH1MMR1-009.046d.mgd.msft.net
X-EOPAttributedMessage:	0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report:	CIP:65.52.44.158;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(428002)(5423002)(199003)(69224002)(189002)(106466001)(81156004)(95666004)(105586002)(20776003)(47776003)(76176999)(86146001)(50986999)(54356999)(15975445006)(31966008)(68736004)(55846006)(2656002)(87936001)(77096002)(107886001)(2351001)(22756005)(66066001)(85306004)(64706001)(97736003)(21056001)(22746005)(104016003)(2501002)(107046002)(106116001)(110136001)(33656002)(101416001)(19580395003)(99396003)(44976005)(4396001)(6806004)(120916001)(80022003)(46102003)(69596002)(84676001)(23676002)(76482002)(92726001)(85852003)(50466002)(86362001)(92566001)(79686002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BN1PR0101MB0867;H:mail.bsnconnect.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en;
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted:	BL2FFO11FD029.protection.gbl
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered:	BL2FFO11FD029.protection.gbl
X-Microsoft-Antispam:	UriScan:;UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam:	BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0101MB0867;
X-Forefront-PRVS:	037291602B
Received-SPF:	None (protection.outlook.com: dow.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Authentication-Results:	spf=none (sender IP is 65.52.44.158) smtp.mailfrom=DAHabermann AT dow DOT com;
X-Microsoft-Antispam:	BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0101MB0930;
X-OriginatorOrg:	dow.com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id s9MDZa9t007104

Read through https://cygwin.com/preliminary-ntsec.html and in general found it to be quite useful.  I'm hoping to do some testing perhaps later this week or early next.  I have a couple of questions:

1) Any thoughts about the rough timing of this "going live"?

2) The documentation says (as I read it): Well-known/builtin accounts named as in Windows, then (for domain member) "Local machine accounts of a domain member machine get a Cygwin user name the same way as accounts from another domain: The local machine name gets prepended".  As I read this, cyg_serv account (under which I currently run SSHD) would now have a new name MYMACHINE+cyg_serv.  Am I reading this correctly?  Is there some reconfiguration I'll need to do to get SSHD to run properly?

3) I also read "Cygwin implements the Solaris API to access Windows ACLs in a Unixy way" (although your email says "Revamp Solaris ACL implementation to more closely work like POSIX ACLs are supposed to work").  So is it Solaris or is it POSIX, and if Solaris then I wonder why since it seems that everywhere else you've tried to be as POSIX as possible.

Thanks for all your hard work on this, I will certainly be one of the benefactors (12 Mb group file, takes hours to refresh so not done since this time last year).

Dave

- Raw text -