X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=aw
	wCcd+wVahQdg7HdflRA9LyvsIZPmjRc2BABILWQXVRlHmIhV5WPg0MvfD9b/IM1v
	ZBulMLM5+uQ7ddU4ZBY3JRzbeK+Aypyk3QH5UEs+Vrru5uw/KFfICFWiOFfFzu88
	I3HVdUPkgaRQpn1/qlvDNisTQ9NVXhC2h/ur6Bv8o=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=Gg5VXyWb
	cGKl7GKGBGBnCdHtOEY=; b=mxn2lWYSIl962apwQvvNMyALEo4qlO4GIuCkFkwm
	YN6dbqq3J/PX1DB78CbARD9QPS7JTzLbcXJ8bVuYFEMFdR7k48R94IAvS15oH+mn
	QzClj20vtG+Dr/7d8IQ8SXoRs3sZ260VkeZUUN/1umgM3UKt+HiOlGBt+dyaBlM3
	D+c=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-la0-f47.google.com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.198.138 with SMTP id jc10mr21485519lac.59.1413173062367; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CADi7v6J5xOcDuv=4aODLswMBSDLaAcNXs5yCM=WBsqbsrLV+zg@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CADi7v6J5xOcDuv=4aODLswMBSDLaAcNXs5yCM=WBsqbsrLV+zg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:04:22 -0400
Message-ID:	<CADi7v6L9NmSDuuOrKfXuu_=6kzKX1Md9zEvtU5VZH91KxMZeGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Necessary To Query SACL Information?
From:	Bryan Berns <bryan DOT berns AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Arg.  Responding to myself.  Apparently ALL_SECURITY_INFORMATION is
internally defined and doesn't contain the flag for SACL information
(so much for being 'ALL').  I'll keep exploring...

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -