X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=H9Mi4FDTiZSU49/BqpziwTl3wgiLrQ4v7wD25/L+whl
	hws+NstEsb3j9ZCTYv2zOI095oEw9c7Laehz7Q0jDvVEaX44suVUO9VBdjqMqRlx
	MCbgREgUXUzQWsk0reoBVZqCAsgL7oFToTHwX+dFK2OvWPOSyD9K/sQnvcNyTtx0
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=g/+QDgTwJBvT6vrBn2YGA1gZ+7Y=; b=nSPGl+LHv1B2mFdkE
	2tDmPaH4jEx4lUR5Yv24MfRs/cLNhO5Di6BwZ798CU3YWbH2X/NznDKHoTB7TGRn
	wXVBfWSDrphrZHrHAYNaQbRCgFXHSV2UKXXuOF2S/C5bF2GYOPaxA4Z6XThsRxc9
	mV7I+XDYQ9jFngikVB5vZGAd3M=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail.lysator.liu.se
Message-ID:	<542273F3.3000504@lysator.liu.se>
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:34:11 +0200
From:	Peter Rosin <peda AT lysator DOT liu DOT se>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: problem with dlsym to fetch address of some functions
References:	<CAHAq8pFUmaSaiRc4LiLK+ieAqB_sPF8iaHFZQ=fzoM-3d+V5PQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5421CCA1 DOT 6000502 AT gmail DOT com> <CAHAq8pEWtSZ8F7bF=4-r2YSQmYnnYL0tcFuMp7gOW-va2g4=mg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAHAq8pEWtSZ8F7bF=4-r2YSQmYnnYL0tcFuMp7gOW-va2g4=mg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2014-09-23 21:52, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> 2014-09-23 16:40 GMT-03:00 Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>:
>> On 23/09/2014 20:43, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>>
>>>    Hi,
>>>
>>>    Forgive me if this is expected. I am probably abusing dlsym
>>> behavior on other systems.
>>
>>
>> It will be much more clear if you
> 
>   Sorry for not clear initial problem description.
> 
>> 1) produce a simple small complete test case,
> 
> $ cat x.c
> extern int sprintf(char*,char*, ...);
> extern int puts(char*);
> extern void *dlsym(void*, char*);
> char buff[128];
> int main(void) {
> int (*fn)(char*,char*,...);
> sprintf(buff, "%.1f", 1.0);
> puts(buff);
> fn = dlsym((void*)0, "sprintf");
> (*fn)(buff, "%.1f", 1.0);
> puts(buff);
> return 0;
> }
> 
> $ gcc -O0 -g3 x.c
> 
>> 2) explain the outcome you obtain (or not)
> 
> $ ./a.exe
> 1.0
> f

The problem is that sprintf is a popular function available in
many dlls. Especially so on Cygwin which is a layer upon layer
thingy. When you are not specifying what dll dlsym should look
in, dlsym just picks the first sprintf it finds.

Consider this program:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <dlfcn.h>

char buff[128];

int main(void) {
	int (*fn)(char*,char*,...);

	void *cygwin1 = dlopen("cygwin1.dll", RTLD_GLOBAL);
	void *ntdll = dlopen("ntdll.dll", RTLD_GLOBAL);
	void *msvcrt = dlopen("msvcrt.dll", RTLD_GLOBAL);

	printf("cygwin1 %p\n", cygwin1);
	printf("ntdll   %p\n", ntdll);
	printf("msvcrt  %p\n", msvcrt);

	fn = dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, "sprintf");
	printf("\n\"default\" sprintf %p\n", fn);
	(*fn)(buff, "%.1f", 1.0);
	puts(buff);

	fn = dlsym(cygwin1, "sprintf");
	printf("\ncygwin1 sprintf %p\n", fn);
	(*fn)(buff, "%.1f", 1.0);
	puts(buff);

	fn = dlsym(ntdll, "sprintf");
	printf("\nntdll sprintf %p\n", fn);
	(*fn)(buff, "%.1f", 1.0);
	puts(buff);

	fn = dlsym(msvcrt, "sprintf");
	printf("\nmsvcrt sprintf %p\n", fn);
	(*fn)(buff, "%.1f", 1.0);
	puts(buff);
	return 0;
}

It produces the following output for me (Cygwin/32):

cygwin1 0x61000000
ntdll   0x77970000
msvcrt  0x75c70000

"default" sprintf 0x77a45555
f

cygwin1 sprintf 0x610d7784
1.0

ntdll sprintf 0x77a45555
f

msvcrt sprintf 0x75c8d354
1.0

So, it appears that you get ntdll:sprintf, which apparently
is not a very complete version. Maybe Cygwin could do better
and look in Cygwin dlls before going on to lower level stuff?
PTC, I'm sure...

Cheers,
Peter


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -