X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=gQrNhdLNUDqN2o/0
	8JVeL7KZN4wN7dvUP3Jq0ewcpcDRWvsZNtqyI9a37UrE++/vQTn77jR0bSOt+ySe
	31VGhiP1Hs+bD8J1X6j57gMIzfuhQlIP/KJXMWKQdmzeGO46O9oHelXPqEcGuos+
	EEIWR0Lh++ZVfwd4NYojJ6OT8zU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=y+zYin0zdnpt+5ReLKyVOo
	LBO/I=; b=GE0kZSHs7mIsFDpDeLGVacLaSm3We0zmtsnFOOqie5OuJFJ0Lv0BDG
	azA1hmqbWmJQBpDHnjjUCKIqmqreRUWB3PNdqTpZLRlo7Tm738v37OtXCQ7aw6gS
	XCDH0ypM50BOAXaXEirtvmMqlBqVPZo2j2rrz6mjAWMYXjdyw5M2s=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,LIKELY_SPAM_SUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	plane.gmane.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Sebastien Vauban <sva-news AT mygooglest DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:21:56 +0200
Lines:	28
Message-ID:	<867g1atq2j.fsf@somewhere.org>
References:	<868um0dgfp DOT fsf AT somewhere DOT org> <54108F3C DOT 5010103 AT cornell DOT edu> <86a966bn5v DOT fsf AT somewhere DOT org> <87bnqmy0b4 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Url:	Under construction...
X-Archive:	encrypt
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.93 (windows-nt)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Achim Gratz wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>> The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to
>> Emacs.
>>
>> But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same
>> range of characters in both worlds?
>
> You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph.

Yes, I was.

> Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with
> differing UTF-8 support.  If they don't have that glyph (which is
> likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it
> from another font with the same dimensions (I don't know if mintty
> does font substitution and if so, how) and the results very much
> depend on the font maps used.

I didn't know about that mechanism. But, then, the question is: why does
Windows Emacs find a substitution, and not Cygwin Emacs (for the same
font)?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -