X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=BAOUdYgIh9qCNe5Y01S137URUa4ILhR7UswmqJ0W5qS
	rt/msZJ255n2fk7uK/QPPbFPXtgYy1qc4T6YQwR8BCihDTZgRThNRm7lvS4BceHr
	4WpCawvzuHKAv1UaK9TIngpH7RQa1k8OjK8HIAsTV26bRl84PKo6v1O9pgRfbnZM
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=vaR8UAhOWN/Z1zIVXnm4LeclgV4=; b=pyqfihDdMhIGSbliC
	rSQy+l5zJs1GMeEais4MvLfO1QVICCgYS3o2hAn+jR/3hF4gnT6uRgPwikoANKRB
	Arw3CbdtkMSrhdKbHwdJWcCu6WfGYtjhoCwTpcQKTTr4t4bSQLqM44eoxZr4+Uut
	z9KB9tJmITcRXxP7urJHQMUNKo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LIKELY_SPAM_SUBJECT,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	limerock01.mail.cornell.edu
X-CornellRouted:	This message has been Routed already.
Message-ID:	<54071EFE.2060607@cornell.edu>
Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:00:30 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
References:	<868um0dgfp DOT fsf AT somewhere DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<868um0dgfp.fsf@somewhere.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of
> Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing
> triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts:
>
> - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts,
>
> - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New and Lucida
>    (among others).
>
> MWE:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ;; these fonts only display (special?) UTF-8 chars (here: the white
> ;; right-pointing triangle) in win32 binary of Emacs
>
> (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . "Consolas-10")))
> (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7)
>
> (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . "Courier New-9")))
> (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7)
>
> (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . "Lucida Console-9")))
> (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7)
>
> ;; these work for both win32 binary of Emacs + Cygwin Emacs
>
> (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . "DejaVu Sans Mono-9")))
> (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7)
>
> (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . "Lucida Sans Typewriter-9")))
> (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Any idea why such differences?

I'm on vacation, but I'll look into this next week when I get back.  In 
the meantime, could you say which version of Cygwin emacs you're using? 
  Is it emacs-X11 or emacs-w32?

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -