X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=tgq8Nj76yFtF9z/Tedk9dVSOl2FZrCeVg+jrgKVYE9c
	y/NWA13RloyLzToYZ/UK9vtvi8VYJbmNAkTp5zTjErlQ30JwofxVcK8+4zxz4k4K
	l6jGOjCFB6zu4lQCdk6KY6twheYJwCdKW8Gm4za57jyIxswarqVYviRgCICxROIo
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=ORfCZF855/MAj2Jgtg3TireyCOM=; b=qj/SZt1VRycyxLGDC
	flwxUtjS/NWsfiXM9runfjNxkSFrplXWWluHpjORQEPhSM6I0KSlq1HBkIfArFTM
	Vm4sSuexek4pPsu8ox21dVFSDayxtenzxeBJOcSTiRX3U8xQSHvBO5Gr5dUskyRZ
	uKkzo+ch6WJxKvKZQb4s4ylCEM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID:	<1407473692.22024.31.camel@yselkowitz.redhat.com>
Subject:	Re: Package file lists archive
From:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:54:52 -0500
In-Reply-To:	<CAAXzdLWw4ma4-i4bAWx4U5oBTvbgn-mP8enL2z4=3R-c-ENHbA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAAXzdLUZ-0iR4NR2j30UPJpmr4LfPtqBXfPtc7vh-nY3ZfF9Ag AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140527221151 DOT GA6521 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5395D00C DOT 1080704 AT etr-usa DOT com> <CAAXzdLWmmQEvwpGFcraT=7+hwfYWRzGbj4YxegAoWScZ46-jfA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140617142906 DOT GE7138 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVFNcyFRbWoWGTAaDj8C=LqvMnZQbNgDfTYCeoM=3sUfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140618061812 DOT GE4920 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVAp_rKLNravSrH81-Kx12TXq2VwwWNcDdxRQxe7Eoc8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <53A185E7 DOT 2030100 AT cygwin DOT com> <CAAXzdLWotgkDaicuV0TYLVeMsmP6inBej6r0u8Ux4oVaL5m7xw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140618152347 DOT GB3974 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVdWpV4kOJFqzTvoo2ZvpGoThN773BRmKC0xzy7VvGnSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1407121227 DOT 2942 DOT 8 DOT camel AT yselkowitz DOT redhat DOT com> <CAAXzdLXhi-Osr9S-9JjUvonXpu2FqK+FZma0xetR9=9gJTVt-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAAXzdLV40v1ztjM0t-75bDcvQwPw1pVXn5Fa5amsMt472bAUoQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <53E3BC1E DOT 9090609 AT cygwin DOT com> <CAAXzdLUN+CcDJDRQVHFRtnGa48i6rPzMJhjjokVJZAcQAWrnjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <53E3F2AB DOT 6060303 AT cygwin DOT com> <CAAXzdLUSvDpe9oYbW! aWcrOcz2V6D8_h4C1CCNugS9vjVCXbkjQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1407468708 DOT 22024 DOT 7 DOT camel AT yselkowitz DOT redhat DOT com> <CAAXzdLWw4ma4-i4bAWx4U5oBTvbgn-mP8enL2z4=3R-c-ENHbA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 22:59 -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > If you wish to continue participating in this forum, then cease these
> > attacks immediately.
> 
> Thank you for the reply, I will heed this going forward. 

Thank you.

> However, do you have any input regarding the topic?

It is somewhat of a known issue; cygcheck -p sometimes times out for me
too, and AFAIK the cause is package-grep.cgi being too slow.  Some of
that might depend on how busy sourceware is at that moment; the fact
that repeat attempts are faster makes me think that is a result of
caching.

Given that we're still working on getting all the infrastructure tasks
under control, optimizing package-grep.cgi would be the only short term
solution; once again, PTC.

In the long term, if were going to drastically change the package
database, IMO it should be in a way that would be used by the website,
cygcheck, and setup*.exe.  A sqlite database comes to mind (as yum uses
one); there are already mingw*-sqlite packages in Ports, and the website
could use DBI and DBD::sqlite.  This is *really* in the realm of PTC
though.


Yaakov


 


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -