X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=vbpWFQ0L0M4zEHZx
	Su7FUsetJQ5gA50lud/SBFXYsKXW7wcDOR7CBhDszVhk9/iO6Sj7fnz9KYNI15rD
	FPHmLg+1W6ZYCNx7KTJ160POWiwiWCGIjSq/Qaj4qQ9FZCY0+5L9eQYHPnRDsrjj
	xVQnzoWpx3+PJ43KVBcMx0EcFmU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=aWnHPymsUjPb48fewsqUWH
	4IECQ=; b=YV1JPWXk71KtgpuiY+IyCKHZJ+TU76T8ZkHMcII961bb3bWdq6hLy6
	aMRwO/u1WCBo1rEy57PGllBjjnQ5Wkg6FJu2K70vVU98VdVY6J/a3FwA5aXUrfrX
	qLkbu0aA+14ROeLA1tjNIZ7oeFAUpbA2ls7VEDirVkYsb0FgmY+qI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173019pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<53E3F2AB.6060303@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:42:03 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Package file lists archive
References:	<CAAXzdLUZ-0iR4NR2j30UPJpmr4LfPtqBXfPtc7vh-nY3ZfF9Ag AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140527221151 DOT GA6521 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5395D00C DOT 1080704 AT etr-usa DOT com> <CAAXzdLWmmQEvwpGFcraT=7+hwfYWRzGbj4YxegAoWScZ46-jfA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140617142906 DOT GE7138 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVFNcyFRbWoWGTAaDj8C=LqvMnZQbNgDfTYCeoM=3sUfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140618061812 DOT GE4920 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVAp_rKLNravSrH81-Kx12TXq2VwwWNcDdxRQxe7Eoc8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <53A185E7 DOT 2030100 AT cygwin DOT com> <CAAXzdLWotgkDaicuV0TYLVeMsmP6inBej6r0u8Ux4oVaL5m7xw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140618152347 DOT GB3974 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVdWpV4kOJFqzTvoo2ZvpGoThN773BRmKC0xzy7VvGnSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1407121227 DOT 2942 DOT 8 DOT camel AT yselkowitz DOT redhat DOT com> <CAAXzdLXhi-Osr9S-9JjUvonXpu2FqK+FZma0xetR9=9gJTVt-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAAXzdLV40v1ztjM0t-75bDcvQwPw1pVXn5Fa5amsMt472bAUoQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <53E3BC1E DOT 9090609 AT cygwin DOT com> <CAAXzdLUN+CcDJDRQVHFRtnGa48i6rPzMJhjjokVJZAcQAWrnjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<CAAXzdLUN+CcDJDRQVHFRtnGa48i6rPzMJhjjokVJZAcQAWrnjA@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/07/2014 05:04 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> The above command works fine for me.  Have you tried this on a different
>> machine or though a different network provider?
>
> It is an intermittent problem. I will be having timeouts with Cygwin when other
> websites will be working perfectly fine. This is the typical situation
>
> - try "cygcheck -p", timeout
> - try again, will work after 15 seconds
> - try again, will work after 7 seconds
> - try again, will work after 1 second, as expected
>
> After that all will be normal, until I try it again several hours later and the
> process just repeats.

Interesting.  OK, I've been running it in a loop for the last half-hour and
haven't seen any timeouts.  I suppose there could be a difference in local
configuration if you're still seeing the issue.  If you think that could be
coming into play, there may be some benefit to posting your cygcheck output
to see if that suggests something.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -