X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Hh9SukF/kSCXIMe68JZykSel1YgjtRSO7hi+7JUmgOe0Z9dTClX1M
	Nqi8X1k08rMCLrtwK3XYgy0tTySFVFjm/XSpEL3ox2X31m5JvAWKS1P/zUgQ4glc
	Mw6X2GtuaL3w8zTir9IxQ8eXIoerlAFWPz1rOl+CxAAulMqBt4+dAI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	bh=7cY2BXN/2b/JcFJqfMyxbai6H6w=; b=VeIm5X00L465glS+/RtfKP8F5Vo6
	GiONbwFx0Zwc8ccJCooQqnjWOJ8cZIOwqKYyWDi0yEmcaDL5rgxhqeylqDb5Wl8L
	nJaQ7MLidGozFwUPkZ72iWIe/OKYMU7m/eW76oQQC28pB1rqAXGV2/RBOututCdp
	kzRCR8WZ/TuUn7Y=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	plane.gmane.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"D. Boland" <daniel AT boland DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: Simplify AD integration?
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:39:18 +0200
Lines:	44
Message-ID:	<53DA6326.7C5690BB@boland.nl>
References:	<20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53DA441F DOT 2260CAE7 AT boland DOT nl> <53DA4FE0 DOT 4020307 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Eric Blake wrote:
> 
> On 07/31/2014 07:26 AM, D. Boland wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> So I'd like to ask a few questions to which I'd like to have some brief
> >> answers, kind of like a poll, to get a better idea how we should
> >> proceed:
> >>
> >> 1. Shall we remove the leading '+' from the builtin account names
> >>    or shall we keep it?
> >>
> >> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one?
> >>    If so, which one?
> >>
> >> 3. Shall we keep the `db_prefix' variability or choose one of
> >>    the prefixing methods and stick to it?  If so, which one, auto,
> >>    primary, or always?
> >
> > I'm a legacy man. So I would say keep the MS symbol and use it like this \daniel,
> > \SYSTEM, etc.
> 
> But you'd have to write that as '\daniel' or \\daniel in the shell, and
> you also cripple tilde expansion.  That's why we already ruled out :, \,
> and / as non-starters, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

I am not only a man of legacy, but also a very opinionated one. So give me some
slack when I say: the whole thing is insane. This would mean that from now on, I
have to use constructs like ~+daniel ~+SYSTEM in a Linux shell?? Bizarre.

On the other hand, for the sake of progress, but keeping legacy there would be only
one acceptable solution: use the tilde symbol. A user could then be referred to as:
~daniel.

This already works in the shell and it is also done by the Apache webserver. If I
want to go my personal web space I can type:

http://localhost/~daniel/

Come to think of it: IMAP does this too! I have been coding for an IMAP project, and
if you want to fetch somebody's mail, you'd have to use ~corinna to display the
contents of her INBOX.

Cheers,
Daniel


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -