X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=TnlAt4
	P4hfkm753H3kOiBSlW4mJ3Ir9r0vIoj2eJDq4JPViSqh0WoSBF2QSKy4dn4bZrp2
	+Kn5BpdZdKgNFrL+VJ7gl5ufV7wGB7/zpQAF2BpsrZuuX3XiNM1VWfpVTb1MWFcA
	kv7VfSWKkU4N/vG94lsBBc9NeqJSr7BUHvZcU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=sScEjZ7nhbRN
	bVrknvebLePxtyE=; b=YRnQnNHCkz8/2MV7Ro4R02FjZJmUU6mmq91ScXj+6E0S
	m+oncgFyvIr4wawYitzXzzi7Pb7dJENOc22DuZJdWJYewE6KlCxzQ3nBVS/+RIcU
	4dWJFi9T/lRH3r/DnnhQuuH7mAUtRNlmDHLBA61jBsREx2kZP6+3webxRyQdRv0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID:	<53DA4FE0.4020307@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:17:04 -0600
From:	Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Simplify AD integration?
References:	<20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53DA441F DOT 2260CAE7 AT boland DOT nl>
In-Reply-To:	<53DA441F.2260CAE7@boland.nl>
OpenPGP:	url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

--REpVo8hwhM5UO6HoBE7Hs4gc918QV7lur
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 07/31/2014 07:26 AM, D. Boland wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> So I'd like to ask a few questions to which I'd like to have some brief
>> answers, kind of like a poll, to get a better idea how we should
>> proceed:
>>
>> 1. Shall we remove the leading '+' from the builtin account names
>>    or shall we keep it?
>>
>> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one?
>>    If so, which one?
>>
>> 3. Shall we keep the `db_prefix' variability or choose one of
>>    the prefixing methods and stick to it?  If so, which one, auto,
>>    primary, or always?
>=20
> I'm a legacy man. So I would say keep the MS symbol and use it like this =
\daniel,
> \SYSTEM, etc.

But you'd have to write that as '\daniel' or \\daniel in the shell, and
you also cripple tilde expansion.  That's why we already ruled out :, \,
and / as non-starters, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


--REpVo8hwhM5UO6HoBE7Hs4gc918QV7lur
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJT2k/gAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqxZ4H/0Kztl/11DcuQPFVNh8YMYf2
Dnl9O5RRUqr/KPwSKs94b+YYadQP+ZMpswTuBozsfurXe5j8PwLMigf393SkoGIr
+XplnbOBVk5261XQVkxt24vDISGMjGMoNc/v5po290FElK9TDWOhQ0zWgx8rekrk
gpUPlFhqqza/2pd+4UucfzXW9wjfl1+f/CFjPqAOJN+t4SDINt9swxSspCT4RPr8
mT8qtUUDQo8ZJqx0ML3CxKG7NQBdiWTFYXhUsKcwWMOMG6q4koaYUpbseuKH30/7
Dlk04KvvWvbJ8cMqiUi8/6qxZIUmdBB7aWU+pJUJ+1zO0cUA/YMTwm+8F4StP4s=
=OWW0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--REpVo8hwhM5UO6HoBE7Hs4gc918QV7lur--

- Raw text -