X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=uj5WgRND707FjtSNDQQg2ZkYtPgg729PYOgMsLEe/AqzvFOY/2Ffr
	WmzYc1oJ2XwiYgQ2N6JLUSQoY/KpiIJdYG5lO0sMzQk3mPxWcBJGJ8TuuHPlYOG0
	BwBC/n66fq5zyisdapCVM2JJdEAY8H2dY0r/t1lXhMZ2eqFAGJCbQQ=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	bh=im0YQSSQE+209Ldp804THOE5x1c=; b=nm4Ed2Dao0fGQ5BW/+ET1gZ1TSAu
	dWR6IbNDLyZWrjB7Yg1Onb4GrQmkx6VGFx6aMAYSvm3XrTupY05sou95DUGXmJp2
	j3/lpFYm3YKDmY6TEhT3GPBoDuwFZJAX52jV67RZLXejoUabs6bHgGBcmXH58bbu
	CnTRSN/varyjVl8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	plane.gmane.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"D. Boland" <daniel AT boland DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: The eternal uid issue
Date:	Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:38:50 +0200
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<53CF749A.1315B799@boland.nl>
References:	<53CF6CEC DOT 6D68E485 AT boland DOT nl> <53CF7012 DOT 2070608 AT tlinx DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Linda Walsh wrote:
> 
> D. Boland wrote:
> > But I had to compromise in some critical areas. One of them is the uid issue.
> >
> > * sendmail, procmail, mail.local assume that the id of the privileged user is '0'.
> >
> > Isn't it about time to make this our First Directive also?
> >
> >
> I thought sendmail used capabilities?
> 
> Isn't it about time none of them used a fixed 'uid', but used capabilities?
> 
> I thought hard coding a Uid was going out with the dodo bird?

You didn't get the point. We create a kernel on which Linux software runs. We don't
dictate how software should be written.

Regards,
Daniel


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -