X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=sWr3M5LYnz5GTTnZ
	1+YBgvmLCddgXIeDvvrX8pZxPXQDFeiXpkJi7B704VEi8hj0h3rFeg6a1PATwXaY
	yrZFQjyc+3GPRxJSMjTycjN395vfFPnFaTaBMGrpLNwHn8RlxDEOWuroOTmRkRYR
	Il907QwPcCjKPWHJo0zDPh9QEW8=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=29F/eVoPOnCAia4YWiwLHN
	s05Do=; b=lH3qkUCnRLQnt43l31cI0ZM12Uk8apeYyNT1/Y/usPV1K53p+TopNy
	ZQYBe3JbVBrHSHGz3fbbcJeHWzbvWGDftHFUw620hmC5ytpolQN33nTShGTJMa0Y
	FRaUaaopJ+6kgJNei9wUP1c82gxatlpky51OiCBYxS5X5gX1B52mw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173019pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<53C9427A.4030104@cygwin.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:51:22 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Some programs (vi, ssh) crash when screen buffer height is big
References:	<CAHV8iDHxzqOwQW6ZTfE1J1AWoJjqSB49cUPrR3M=KrgP19=NPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAHV8iDG3JeKK1pF+Upk8+7zvqTRzir7r2Rp6-R_gGwH8cwpTmw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAHV8iDHFYe__rQ5ghDNgHfj_GJ6ObVDfmx4u9aXRDzURN-C8UQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<CAHV8iDHFYe__rQ5ghDNgHfj_GJ6ObVDfmx4u9aXRDzURN-C8UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/18/2014 10:48 AM, sous lesquels wrote:
>> It's not reproducible for me.  I just tried your ssh scenario with a
>> 1000 and 2000 line buffers and it works fine for me every time, be it
>> with Cygwin 1.7.30 or the latest snapshot.  I also raised the number of
>> loops.  Is it possible that you're suffering a BLODA(*) problem?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Corinna
>
>> Confirmed.
>>
>> I tried up to 9999, the maximum allowed.
>>
>> This is under Windows 8.1 Pro, with Cygwin 1.7.30, both 32- and 64-bit.
>
> I was running under:
>
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1 1.7.29(0.272/5/3) 2014-04-07 13:46
>
> It might have been a feature present in 1.7.29.
>
> More likely, it was a installation issue. I had cygwin1.dll with
> 1.7.29 and cygwin1.dll.new with 1.7.30. I ran setup-x86_64.exe
> multiple times and it did nothing to upgrade it (I assume it renames
> cygwin1.dll.new to cygwin1.dll, correct?). No cywgin processes were
> running otherwise. What helped is to manually reinstall "cygwin"
> package. Now that I'm at 1.7.30, all seems OK. Probably just a version
> mismatch.

This is not the recommended way of handling this situation.  You end up
with a ".new" extension if the DLL was in use at the time of your upgrade.
In this case, setup*.exe schedules a replace of your existing DLL with the
".new" version on reboot.  So if you find such a file on your system, the
sanctioned resolution to this is to reboot.

> As a side topic, I did not get a mail with your (Corinna / Warren)
> replies, just a digest, and could not reply to it. Not sure how it
> will thread. Is there a way to somehow specify which post to reply to
> in the body of the mail, so that it threads as I want? As per
> https://sourceware.org/lists.html#what-software, ezmlm-idx is used and
> as per http://untroubled.org/ezmlm/faq/How-threading-works.html#How-threading-works
> it threads by subject, not using In-Reply-To or so. And even if it
> did, I cannot specify headers via Gmail (firewall, cannot use other
> email clients unfortunately). If not a simple answer, I'll open a
> separate thread.

You must have subscribed to the list and requested a digest.  By
default, any email replies to this list go to the list.  If you
want a direct copy, you have to ask for it and you rely on the
kindness of the responder to put in the extra effort to comply.
The best way to get individual messages from this list that are easy
to reply to is to subscribe without using the digest option.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -