X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=cS9IxsCK32/Jez/rROA81FKS1ny0TN+ZH9LdVv2LD14vmiDJXC/Aa
	8vwgIN5bf+H4h8JBKuaNMAZ60whI6Ayg+lz1PpycPw9UoZUQQKQb3X2bZ9fjfYJV
	dFYAYtdu99cluft5+J7IY6q4QOCvele0AitTex9BkMQvWbeCbhKMEY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	bh=cPgDoJJWsR8hpvZwPcmcHE2klCQ=; b=bRomW4G8ZhJ/kTnCendgn9SLaD2p
	9iZAaxnKkIn3mVgzgEflYAStWGFe8x3ZIWDwRwHNwiDr8HUdZDdp42dVvxfUX1ih
	efgU9+Xy3kHZOQ04hHE9jKGVrJr+2bjr9oEjbtIUDYk3B3kJAWAL5HsvTrul21RG
	NWvX3bJpZ4Y11L0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-qc0-f182.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.140.98.118 with SMTP id n109mr2678861qge.13.1405654881572; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<1405654877.5692.0.camel@YAAKOV04>
Subject:	Re: Shouldn't 'man' depend on 'col'? Shouldn't 'col' be easier to
From:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 22:41:17 -0500
find%3f:
References:
%3cCAJqfdW6bCQ4PLnSO2o6a1gd-veLogad9he9TcddZzk9sw8Jr-w%40mail.gmail.com%3e:
%3c53BC191A.5020606%40gmail.com%3e%20%3c1737600071.20140708190126%40breisch.org%3e:
%3c53BC89E9.2040303%40cygwin.com%3e%20%3c1905321742.20140708202953%40breisch.org%3e:
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 20:29:53 -0400, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> At Tuesday, July 8, 2014, 8:16:41 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2014-07-08 18:01, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
>>> At Tuesday, July 8, 2014, 12:15:22 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>> On 08/07/2014 17:47, Jack Duthen wrote:
>>>> util-linux is a popular package, so the issue was not yet noticed.
>>>
>>>> man was recently changed, so this dependency was likely missed,
>>>> specially as it seems hidden inside the man binary.
>>>
>>> Yes,  this is true. I'll add it. I'm collecting a few things together,
> 
>> Careful: right now util-linux requires: perl, so people will complain
>> if it gets pulled as is.  I'll attempt to address this soon.
> 
> Yes, I just noticed that.

The new util-linux-2.24.2 no longer requires perl.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -