X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=wvg96laggLSjfytvRaljIe3LtmZCV
	QugGSEY6qiZOr/N+TkAGmYw7QpPxXBYk/wS38W/3qMiC82vedjoZ/c9HGglRuZm8
	3/G9tQJ5doS/aQlPBze2tAi766f4RWGnFNPjoqoyQC3D1QD5dsbyIooyozrVFeM5
	nVycTl0z/S3WxY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; s=default; bh=9TD9deBPulC9QbRTnQhj8ZkZP84=; b=JU/
	hZTxc5gNf6iSDQ5gWD1kzBpURpgXUzwELRN1l38Tt6EEAUmK80FZigI/i1hFNuHc
	5uX4V6IGyIZlDj0oyvGrCopGXXWqENyWX82odxOyzZ4+qzsm2OWz3O9nBsgK2QbE
	pJFr8VZf/z/kyNk6+RcXPprY2/p+qH1wfXaH8ask=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-la0-f45.google.com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.27.66 with SMTP id r2mr8334024lag.53.1405435547774; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:45:47 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAO1jNwtfhebZsA7fUadApxJSbrmY2KPK1+k7eo3YJvDUmqCoNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Core dump on 32-bit Cygwin if program calls dlopen
From:	Jan Nijtmans <jan DOT nijtmans AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

2014-07-15 16:39 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen:
> On Jul 15 21:55, JonY wrote:
>> On 7/15/2014 21:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >>
>> >> FWIW, the problem disappears if I revert gcc-core and libgcc1 to 4.8.2-2.
>> >
>> > JonY, do you have a chance to have a look into this issue?
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, I have been busy these few weeks, but I am well aware that there
>> is a problem with one of the libgcc changes, but has yet to investigate it.
>>
>> I believe Jon Turney has looked into it somewhat.
>
> Sounds good.  Thanks in advance.

Is this essentially the same problem as described here?

    <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00180.html>

Regards,
           Jan Nijtmans

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -