X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Y2ygHytEsbwRtOXcy81DN+WW98BRs8zIJlHy4S6aMyGqP++gibfof
	WPkVrS2kVjlUM997ezWj/PpqpqotSNVPweanFAjLHa+htsYgOczHAlf3S3dL2qn5
	YXyzYhgGQUVVSBYP8UcTT2F3SiiJYMAmjoHjwzRX9cy/9HbJRedmlg=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	bh=I/HJ9tVC0IIavvkcgIH90/ECa5I=; b=vTFxEpRJ5FO8sBn6jYbUnTsiHYC0
	K4blHBSJwhykgAT7sTeLeCsqZKv0dXs+SKDgg+HGnRiAyTPdVy8RAzxJoooGuUDU
	h5D1yyUtkU8/cEQHvDfadHAFnwr9cj+IOepuHaT5E8eQcHjBc4HxhvDbE2DKjZxU
	JnK4oVsuy+XeL+g=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	plane.gmane.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"D. Boland" <daniel AT boland DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: rebaseall breaks some packages(?)
Date:	Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:21:05 +0200
Lines:	33
Message-ID:	<53B91501.18796CB7@boland.nl>
References:	<b4mr42oujhi DOT fsf AT jpl DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Hi Katsumi,

Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:

> However, those reinstallations cause some other programs to not
> work.  For those other programs, rebaseall does help.  Though it
> breaks bzr, emacs-w3m, etc. again.  It's annoying.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> Regards,

I agree. It's annoying. See this post also:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-11/msg00894.html

I'm a developer of Windows software for 15 years now, and my clients never had to
rebase my binaries.

I'm also a Linux teacher and I use Cygwin in class. My students (100+) repeatedly
got these errors, so I switched to an improved version of apt-cyg, which does not
rebase. I'm a happy teacher now.

What's the deal with this "rebasing" anyway? Every compiler has a built-in mechanism
to create unique offsets. Windows itself also rebases binaries at load-time. 

On the other hand, why not rebase at compile-time? Rebasing should not be the
responsibility of the user, but of the developer. See this article:

http://harshdeep.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/thou-shalt-rebase-thy-dll/

Hmm.. This turned out to be a rant. I'm sorry for hijacking your thread.

Daniel


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -