X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=eOe+osjQ08bd3TT9odt5DA09EGugdFbtlDV5V9serdW
	U9yBynN89kcHFtRbslExCKFsQCAVz0p1SvCsB8z8pgt5v1+nHAYZ5DKVh5BSIgBZ
	Cfq1g69Sq2ShHhT4RkwQvYcUdJ8mOEPolkpMB+FrG+nYLTALC2BKLAi3LbMth+60
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=VRg5/ZZXzkHCK1GSRsvpnekV/eU=; b=OTOpEX6nh6K7nBgHB
	vW6R3wUXh1TF6NCPfzMSMa0GXUO+cViFy8yz58rt8+A0ZlWd1KE9MleGlNeXE5PO
	6wqqfekbMLo89RTQoBs8r97UGQ6lBALqngE7JalDbaoMAt/LNAY/6ZRZSxxP0fxq
	1A02JpvlMcXylAtAmwufoUVQnU=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	limerock01.mail.cornell.edu
X-CornellRouted:	This message has been Routed already.
Message-ID:	<53A852B6.4050702@cornell.edu>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:15:50 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: getaddrinfo : Non-recoverable failure in name resolution
References:	<53A81259 DOT 4080300 AT gmail DOT com> <20140623122510 DOT GD1803 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53A82688 DOT 9010005 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<53A82688.9010005@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 6/23/2014 9:07 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> On 23/06/2014 14:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> On Jun 23 13:41, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
>>>
>>> 64 $ ./getaddrinfo_test-2_64
>>> getaddrinfo: Non-recoverable failure in name resolution
>>>
>>>
>>> Am I missing something ?
>>> The second way is currently used on postgresql in several places,
>>> but it seems to fail only for "127.0.0.1"
>>
>> I don't know why this only fails for "127.0.0.1".  But this is clearly a
>> problem in the 64 bit Cygwin DLL.
>>
>> What happens is that the field ai_addrlen is defined as socklen_t in
>> POSIX, but as size_t in the W32 API.  On 64 bit, socklen_t is 4 bytes
>> while size_t is 8 bytes.  Setting all the hintp members manually (in
>> contrast to calloc'ing it or memset'ing it to 0) leaves the 4 upper
>> bytes of the ai_addrlen untouched.  This in turn leads to a high
>> probability that ai_addrlen has an invalid value when entering Winsock's
>> getsockopt.
>>
>> I'm really surprised this hasn't been hit before.  I'm going to fix that
>> in Cygwin by setting the upper 4 bytes of ai_addrlen to 0 explicitely.
>
> Probably we have seen already but not identified.

I wonder if this could explain the mysterious emacs crashes that have 
been reported on 64-bit Cygwin.  The emacs code does set the hintp 
members manually in some places.

The crashes seem to occur randomly, and the backtraces often don't make 
sense.

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -