X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=LH0ew0sesDxzurBX
	Jg6oNBBunn1R0e0fX4StRc1gV4FtAQsp84MVWoqsmLyXUWdn4opm8+/3dldHu476
	QhjWHy6y/SmrDpi+ax+u5ncOK3C2zN3zj1UmiYI5h9zSfRta2ZLoqDaIH0Vkj8y6
	DAil/V/UAgxfze7hZF7fP9WcXss=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=t6vrDfOsMn4cm/uY6atllu
	LQwWA=; b=AWQmnVOj3x1/0rfwe/59X+suCvT7zJeio0DEO8SGGAUEOpjNFddJuj
	xmK11obcbPy939v6foYBqR52K2q0MgkRByko1X/v2qlKik/iGkrkqLGXNXVFk0/S
	nOXEikI72sSS//8izappZxruxK9Nu/gi+rv15LBWMgMKDL+lZCIbM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173025pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<53A77E6E.3030805@cygwin.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:10:06 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Too many mailing lists(passing the buck)
References:	<53A4A299 DOT 6090508 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140621115148 DOT GB17140 AT dinwoodie DOT org> <53A748ED DOT 8060609 AT tlinx DOT org> <20140622213806 DOT GA6162 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-reply-to:	<20140622213806.GA6162@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

On 06/22/2014 05:38 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:07:37PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>>>
>>>> Every time someone says "That's not on topic here, go elsewhere," it
>>>> can easily be read as "Go away."  The Cygwin project should only be
>>>> pushing away toxic people, and multiple mailing lists do not have
>>>> that happy side effect.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've never seen a reply saying "that's not on topic here, go away" that
>>> could be read as you describe.
>> ----
>>    You didn't even bother to check google?
>> i settled on looking at bash:
>> bash cygwin "off-topic" -stackoverflow
>>
>> But have seen similar for X11 related.
>>
>> on the first page: (all talking about the topic being wrong for the list
>> involved).
>>
>> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00252.html
>> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-03/msg00691.html
>> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-11/msg00423.html
>> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-02/msg00343.html
>>
>> vs.  the opposite problem where a cygwin devel yanked my prob from a
>> cp-bug-report and closed it:
>>
>> bug was related to a case-bug using cp -a and being told it was a
>> cygwin bug unless I could recreate it on linux (even though the bad
>> code was in 'cp'.)
>>
>> (had to do with ignoring case, and creating it with a case ignoring FS
>> on linux would have been too much of a pain (like XFS has such an
>> option) .
>>
>> project owners constantly like to pass the buck in hopes the user will
>> give up...usually project owners win because reporting bugs is too much
>> trouble.
>
> But, then, I know of cygwin devs who feed orphans, rescues kittens, and
> work to prevent global warming.  So, as long as we're making
> unsubtantiated allegations, it all works out in the end.

Would it be wrong of me to point out that we may have gone off-topic with
all this talk of passing the buck and feeding orphans?  Oh, the irony
of it all!

OK, sorry.  I just couldn't resist. ;-)


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -