| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
| :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
| :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
| :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= | |
| default; b=H0aiBmDzFbVztpZKCSZKx2nOuO3m006oCMcgN7ekclwKbZlC76mLT | |
| lR+WRy1aK4Nqap5NtkoJ6ujPPr5DN8x9Ha2zRFhQH52Zzf6l6yFt8aabr2KqrC3f | |
| MPKpDawq9oguKezXBeg1FSWNIO24Wu3B7vRiCdg1hcKdKnoihYPVbQ= | |
| DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
| :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
| :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to | |
| :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; | |
| bh=/h1QBEVMCwO5Y17m9MF+tJFYXAA=; b=tCNItqiHrqPKhnKhRWbT2TrXP814 | |
| 7OU9ZR8tjhZXHxrKXJXZOpEXAq/F4x63hPaLeKtZPV61RSvTGRpa6hkw1gq5svo9 | |
| ijYTGosuG8XL7aAOddje7MheM0orfBXBDgo4snYZbrO0eUONx8Po1ryaeWm2RoEa | |
| vWyah53mmtmQCIs= | |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
| X-Virus-Found: | No |
| X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 |
| X-HELO: | mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org |
| X-Mail-Handler: | Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn |
| X-Report-Abuse-To: | abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) |
| X-MHO-User: | U2FsdGVkX18kgi1UKJnlZ3n6jIbwpbAe |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:22:03 -0400 |
| From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Package file lists archive |
| Message-ID: | <20140618152203.GA3974@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
| Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| References: | <CAAXzdLUx+zsvXGDfYyBkounDNLsMy8oW1ZmGZtLoOA-XfeDQHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140526201210 DOT GB3903 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLUZ-0iR4NR2j30UPJpmr4LfPtqBXfPtc7vh-nY3ZfF9Ag AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140527221151 DOT GA6521 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5395D00C DOT 1080704 AT etr-usa DOT com> <CAAXzdLWmmQEvwpGFcraT=7+hwfYWRzGbj4YxegAoWScZ46-jfA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140617142906 DOT GE7138 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVFNcyFRbWoWGTAaDj8C=LqvMnZQbNgDfTYCeoM=3sUfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140618061812 DOT GE4920 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVAp_rKLNravSrH81-Kx12TXq2VwwWNcDdxRQxe7Eoc8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <CAAXzdLVAp_rKLNravSrH81-Kx12TXq2VwwWNcDdxRQxe7Eoc8Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:53:14AM -0500, Steven Penny wrote: >On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Your idea of "constructive" is apparently flawed. > >This is an interesting comment, taking in that your response ignores the >original question and focuses on off topic quibbling. I will pose your viewpoint >and my question again I was actually staying on-topic with what I wanted to address: namely the thin ice that you are walking with your posting style. >>And, frankly, I think it's a bad idea to keep a monolithic list of >>packages available for people to download anyway. > >Do you have an explanation for this opinion, or citations as to why >this is a bad idea, taking into account that major Linux distros are >already using this very method? Frankly, I don't have to justify my opinion. I understand how the package generation would have to work and don't see a major benefit to introducing a package list file given the amount of work and the fact that I would have to do the work. I also don't want to spend my time debating with you about why it is or isn't a good idea. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |