delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from | |
:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id | |
:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=lBdkcjmK6d2l2UuY77V9Tmcecfp3 | |
7pnjWK6fA6P2rFWa8+PITcX3UR7JW8yBwKPWFWE3FkucAfh6TJZB9fALgt39BkcK | |
gQJ309G43jPFrRvQjxEK5w3y2vVhWQi+AfprpJdSV3AeO4RPHOiWg1AZdleyJjo4 | |
nNXTGTvVf2/5w50= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from | |
:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id | |
:references:to; s=default; bh=4kknLDCqjSTEcFhGtcyu+eCS0xk=; b=oB | |
OPKbZGPORFV4XULHYmPJ6i+8zuTGG4C6smob4mZos7ykpdf+CNB88eYO1lbGcxKx | |
fYjTmmgX6Obncury6CnMBvelAalcCk8913plteVtH6f7Z0noFzjGrf4Uy0zAJ4tl | |
A/+VpbgXFn1TC8QFmvqBZh+fCDtQ2ZqgCPJzMd1Ew= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Virus-Found: | No |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 |
X-HELO: | smtp4-g21.free.fr |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) |
Subject: | Re: gecos from AD? (was Re: timeout in LDAP access) |
From: | Denis Excoffier <cygwin AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> |
In-Reply-To: | <20140617125154.GR23700@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2014 01:07:39 +0200 |
Message-Id: | <D37584EE-6FF3-4EDC-8EF9-83CF1BD411AD@Denis-Excoffier.org> |
References: | <F312783D-AD66-4614-922B-E44403C7E372 AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> <20140617100011 DOT GL23700 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140617103014 DOT GP23700 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140617125154 DOT GR23700 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s5HN7tmE015312 |
On 2014-06-17 14:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 17 12:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Jun 17 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Jun 16 22:39, Denis Excoffier wrote: >>>> Another (unrelated and less important) problem is that 'getent' >>>> happily produces lines with some extra ‘:’, in particular when the >>>> gecos field itself contains ‘:’. >>> >>> Wow, that *is* important. All fields returned from the server have to >>> get their colons converted to commas. I'll fix that. > > On second thought, removing colons should only occur for gecos. The > other fields shouldn't contain colons anyway since their content has to > be POSIX-compatible anyway. > > So, either I add code to remove the colons from the gecos field … This. > > >> While we're at it... do we really need the gecos info? Cygwin fills >> out this field with the Windows username and SID info for internal >> purposes, and then adds the gecos info from AD. However, it's just >> informational and usually only used by the finger(1) tool. >> >> Shall I just remove fetching the gecos fields from AD entirely? > > ... or that. Not that. Denis Excoffier. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |